agent.ai vs cabina.ai
Market traction comparison · Updated Jul 2026
| agent.ai | cabina.ai | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Monthly Visits | 282.9K | 165.2K | agent.ai |
| Bounce Rate | 41.9% | 37.9% | cabina.ai |
| SEO & Keywords | 30 | 35 | cabina.ai |
| Domain Age | 8y 8m | 2y 6m | agent.ai |
agent.ai leads in 2 of 4 dimensions, while cabina.ai leads in 2.
Growth Momentum
| agent.ai | cabina.ai | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Monthly Visits | 282.9K | 165.2K | agent.ai |
| MoM Change | -2% | -4% | agent.ai |
| Avg. Session | 1m14s | 0m39s | agent.ai |
| Pages / Visit | 2.8 | 2.0 | agent.ai |
Growth Momentum · Insight
agent.ai receives 1.7x more monthly traffic than cabina.ai (282.9K vs 165.2K).
Acquisition Strategy
| agent.ai | cabina.ai | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary Channel | Direct 50% | Search 48% | |
| Bounce Rate | 41.9% | 37.9% | cabina.ai |
| SEO & Keywords | 30 | 35 | cabina.ai |
Keyword Overlap Rate: 25%
Acquisition Strategy · Insight
agent.ai acquires users primarily through Direct (50%), while cabina.ai relies on Search (48%). This reflects fundamentally different go-to-market strategies — agent.ai's higher direct traffic suggests stronger brand recognition or product-led growth, while cabina.ai's search reliance means growth is more scalable but more vulnerable to algorithm changes.
Business Maturity
| agent.ai | cabina.ai | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Domain Age | 8y 8m | 2y 6m | agent.ai |
| Registered | Dec 2017 | Mar 2024 | |
| Expires | May 2028 | Mar 2028 |
Business Maturity · Insight
agent.ai has a 6-year head start, but cabina.ai's trajectory shows steady market presence.
Market Position
| agent.ai | cabina.ai | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Global Rank | #160.3K | #278.7K | agent.ai |
| Category Rank | #2.7K | #2.2K | cabina.ai |
| PH Upvotes | 592 | — |
agent.ai only
cabina.ai only
Market Position · Insight
Each has untapped markets the other serves: agent.ai could expand into Ukraine, Indonesia, while cabina.ai could target United Kingdom, Vietnam.
Key Takeaways
- •agent.ai receives 1.7x more monthly traffic than cabina.ai (282.9K vs 165.2K).
- •agent.ai acquires users primarily through Direct (50%), while cabina.ai relies on Search (48%). This reflects fundamentally different go-to-market strategies — agent.ai's higher direct traffic suggests stronger brand recognition or product-led growth, while cabina.ai's search reliance means growth is more scalable but more vulnerable to algorithm changes.
- •agent.ai has 1.7x more traffic (282.9K vs 165.2K), though both operate at comparable scale.
- •agent.ai keeps visitors significantly longer (1m14s avg session vs cabina.ai's 0m39s), suggesting deeper product engagement or stickier content.
- •agent.ai acquires traffic primarily through Direct (50%), while cabina.ai relies on Search (48%) — fundamentally different acquisition strategies.
- •They share 13 keywords (25% overlap), indicating direct search competition.
You've seen the gap. Now steal the playbook.
A Growth Teardown reverse-engineers exactly how each product grows — traffic sources, backlink strategy, keyword gaps, and scored action items you can copy this week.
Related Comparisons
Report based on data from July 2026