agent.ai vs gravitee.io
Market traction comparison · Updated Jul 2026
| agent.ai | gravitee.io | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Monthly Visits | 282.9K | 143.5K | agent.ai |
| Bounce Rate | 41.9% | 45.4% | agent.ai |
| SEO & Keywords | 30 | 30 | Tie |
| Domain Age | 8y 8m | 11y 3m | gravitee.io |
agent.ai leads in 2 of 4 dimensions, while gravitee.io leads in 1.
Growth Momentum
| agent.ai | gravitee.io | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Monthly Visits | 282.9K | 143.5K | agent.ai |
| MoM Change | -2% | -11% | agent.ai |
| Avg. Session | 1m14s | 0m47s | agent.ai |
| Pages / Visit | 2.8 | 1.9 | agent.ai |
Growth Momentum · Insight
agent.ai receives 2.0x more monthly traffic than gravitee.io (282.9K vs 143.5K).
Acquisition Strategy
| agent.ai | gravitee.io | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary Channel | Direct 50% | Search 57% | |
| Bounce Rate | 41.9% | 45.4% | agent.ai |
| SEO & Keywords | 30 | 30 | — |
Keyword Overlap Rate: 50%
Acquisition Strategy · Insight
agent.ai acquires users primarily through Direct (50%), while gravitee.io relies on Search (57%). This reflects fundamentally different go-to-market strategies — agent.ai's higher direct traffic suggests stronger brand recognition or product-led growth, while gravitee.io's search reliance means growth is more scalable but more vulnerable to algorithm changes.
Business Maturity
| agent.ai | gravitee.io | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Domain Age | 8y 8m | 11y 3m | gravitee.io |
| Registered | Dec 2017 | Jun 2015 | |
| Expires | May 2028 | Jun 2026 |
Business Maturity · Insight
gravitee.io has been in the market for over a decade, indicating established presence.
Market Position
| agent.ai | gravitee.io | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Global Rank | #160.3K | #313.0K | agent.ai |
| Category Rank | #2.7K | #1.4K | gravitee.io |
| PH Upvotes | 592 | — |
agent.ai only
gravitee.io only
Market Position · Insight
Each has untapped markets the other serves: agent.ai could expand into France, while gravitee.io could target Vietnam.
Key Takeaways
- •agent.ai receives 2.0x more monthly traffic than gravitee.io (282.9K vs 143.5K).
- •agent.ai acquires users primarily through Direct (50%), while gravitee.io relies on Search (57%). This reflects fundamentally different go-to-market strategies — agent.ai's higher direct traffic suggests stronger brand recognition or product-led growth, while gravitee.io's search reliance means growth is more scalable but more vulnerable to algorithm changes.
- •agent.ai has 2.0x more traffic (282.9K vs 143.5K), though both operate at comparable scale.
- •agent.ai keeps visitors significantly longer (1m14s avg session vs gravitee.io's 0m47s), suggesting deeper product engagement or stickier content.
- •agent.ai acquires traffic primarily through Direct (50%), while gravitee.io relies on Search (57%) — fundamentally different acquisition strategies.
- •They share 20 keywords (50% overlap), indicating direct search competition.
You've seen the gap. Now steal the playbook.
A Growth Teardown reverse-engineers exactly how each product grows — traffic sources, backlink strategy, keyword gaps, and scored action items you can copy this week.
Related Comparisons
Report based on data from July 2026