aimagazine.com vs fungry.co.jp
Market traction comparison · Updated Jul 2026
| aimagazine.com | fungry.co.jp | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Monthly Visits | 175.5K | 49.6K | aimagazine.com |
| Bounce Rate | 43.1% | 65.9% | aimagazine.com |
| SEO & Keywords | 30 | 30 | Tie |
| Domain Age | 25y 8m | — |
aimagazine.com leads in 2 of 3 dimensions, while fungry.co.jp leads in 0.
Growth Momentum
| aimagazine.com | fungry.co.jp | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Monthly Visits | 175.5K | 49.6K | aimagazine.com |
| MoM Change | -5% | +36% | fungry.co.jp |
| Avg. Session | 0m42s | 2m12s | fungry.co.jp |
| Pages / Visit | 2.1 | 1.6 | aimagazine.com |
Growth Momentum · Insight
aimagazine.com is losing traffic (-5%) despite 175.5K monthly visits. fungry.co.jp's +36% growth puts it on a trajectory to overtake.
Acquisition Strategy
| aimagazine.com | fungry.co.jp | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary Channel | Search 51% | Search 79% | |
| Bounce Rate | 43.1% | 65.9% | aimagazine.com |
| SEO & Keywords | 30 | 30 | — |
Keyword Overlap Rate: 18%
Acquisition Strategy · Insight
aimagazine.com acquires users primarily through Search (51%), while fungry.co.jp relies on Search (79%). This reflects fundamentally different go-to-market strategies — aimagazine.com's higher direct traffic suggests stronger brand recognition or product-led growth, while fungry.co.jp's search reliance means growth is more scalable but more vulnerable to algorithm changes.
Business Maturity
| aimagazine.com | fungry.co.jp | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Domain Age | 25y 8m | — | |
| Registered | Dec 2000 | — | |
| Expires | Dec 2029 | — |
Market Position
| aimagazine.com | fungry.co.jp | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Global Rank | #253.2K | #759.9K | aimagazine.com |
| Category Rank | #4.0K | #1.4K | fungry.co.jp |
aimagazine.com only
fungry.co.jp only
Market Position · Insight
fungry.co.jp is heavily concentrated in Japan (91%), creating dependency risk on a single market. aimagazine.com has a more diversified audience.
Each has untapped markets the other serves: aimagazine.com could expand into Japan, while fungry.co.jp could target United Kingdom, Italy, Indonesia.
Key Takeaways
- •aimagazine.com is losing traffic (-5%) despite 175.5K monthly visits. fungry.co.jp's +36% growth puts it on a trajectory to overtake.
- •aimagazine.com acquires users primarily through Search (51%), while fungry.co.jp relies on Search (79%). This reflects fundamentally different go-to-market strategies — aimagazine.com's higher direct traffic suggests stronger brand recognition or product-led growth, while fungry.co.jp's search reliance means growth is more scalable but more vulnerable to algorithm changes.
- •aimagazine.com receives 3.5x more monthly traffic than fungry.co.jp (175.5K vs 49.6K).
- •fungry.co.jp is growing (+36%) while aimagazine.com is declining (-5%).
- •fungry.co.jp keeps visitors significantly longer (2m12s avg session vs aimagazine.com's 0m42s), suggesting deeper product engagement or stickier content.
- •aimagazine.com has a 23 percentage point lower bounce rate (43% vs 66%), indicating better landing page relevance or more targeted traffic.
You've seen the gap. Now steal the playbook.
A Growth Teardown reverse-engineers exactly how each product grows — traffic sources, backlink strategy, keyword gaps, and scored action items you can copy this week.
Related Comparisons
Report based on data from July 2026