aivideomaker.ai vs steve.ai
Market traction comparison · Updated Jul 2026
| aivideomaker.ai | steve.ai | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Monthly Visits | 100.5K | 302.0K | steve.ai |
| Bounce Rate | 40.8% | 38.4% | steve.ai |
| SEO & Keywords | 35 | 34 | aivideomaker.ai |
| Domain Age | 2y 10m | 8y 6m | steve.ai |
steve.ai leads in 3 of 4 dimensions, while aivideomaker.ai leads in 1.
Growth Momentum
| aivideomaker.ai | steve.ai | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Monthly Visits | 100.5K | 302.0K | steve.ai |
| MoM Change | -21% | +1% | steve.ai |
| Avg. Session | 9m54s | 1m28s | aivideomaker.ai |
| Pages / Visit | 3.8 | 3.9 | steve.ai |
Growth Momentum · Insight
steve.ai is growing faster (+1%) but visitors stay 6.7x shorter (1m28s vs 9m54s). Rapid growth with declining engagement depth often signals lower-quality traffic or shallow product usage.
Acquisition Strategy
| aivideomaker.ai | steve.ai | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary Channel | Direct 70% | Search 52% | |
| Bounce Rate | 40.8% | 38.4% | steve.ai |
| SEO & Keywords | 35 | 34 | aivideomaker.ai |
Keyword Overlap Rate: 33%
Acquisition Strategy · Insight
aivideomaker.ai acquires users primarily through Direct (70%), while steve.ai relies on Search (52%). This reflects fundamentally different go-to-market strategies — aivideomaker.ai's higher direct traffic suggests stronger brand recognition or product-led growth, while steve.ai's search reliance means growth is more scalable but more vulnerable to algorithm changes.
Business Maturity
| aivideomaker.ai | steve.ai | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Domain Age | 2y 10m | 8y 6m | steve.ai |
| Registered | Oct 2023 | Feb 2018 | |
| Expires | Oct 2027 | Feb 2028 |
Business Maturity · Insight
steve.ai has a 6-year head start, but aivideomaker.ai's trajectory shows steady market presence.
Market Position
| aivideomaker.ai | steve.ai | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Global Rank | #329.5K | #130.4K | steve.ai |
| Category Rank | — | #756 | |
| PH Upvotes | 11 | 51 | steve.ai |
aivideomaker.ai only
steve.ai only
Market Position · Insight
aivideomaker.ai is heavily concentrated in China (42%), creating dependency risk on a single market. steve.ai has a more diversified audience.
Each has untapped markets the other serves: aivideomaker.ai could expand into India, Pakistan, Brazil, while steve.ai could target China, France, Japan.
Key Takeaways
- •aivideomaker.ai is losing traffic (-21%) despite 100.5K monthly visits. steve.ai's +1% growth puts it on a trajectory to overtake.
- •steve.ai is growing faster (+1%) but visitors stay 6.7x shorter (1m28s vs 9m54s). Rapid growth with declining engagement depth often signals lower-quality traffic or shallow product usage.
- •aivideomaker.ai acquires users primarily through Direct (70%), while steve.ai relies on Search (52%). This reflects fundamentally different go-to-market strategies — aivideomaker.ai's higher direct traffic suggests stronger brand recognition or product-led growth, while steve.ai's search reliance means growth is more scalable but more vulnerable to algorithm changes.
- •steve.ai receives 3.0x more monthly traffic than aivideomaker.ai (302.0K vs 100.5K).
- •steve.ai is growing (+1%) while aivideomaker.ai is declining (-21%).
- •aivideomaker.ai keeps visitors significantly longer (9m54s avg session vs steve.ai's 1m28s), suggesting deeper product engagement or stickier content.
You've seen the gap. Now steal the playbook.
A Growth Teardown reverse-engineers exactly how each product grows — traffic sources, backlink strategy, keyword gaps, and scored action items you can copy this week.
Related Comparisons
Report based on data from July 2026