amazon.jobs vs amazon.science
Market traction comparison · Updated Jul 2026
amazon.jobs
amazon.science| amazon.jobs | amazon.science | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Monthly Visits | 13.1M | 319.0K | amazon.jobs |
| Bounce Rate | 35.2% | 49.6% | amazon.jobs |
| SEO & Keywords | 30 | 30 | Tie |
| Domain Age | 20y 11m | 11y 7m | amazon.jobs |
amazon.jobs leads in 3 of 4 dimensions, while amazon.science leads in 0.
Growth Momentum
| amazon.jobs | amazon.science | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Monthly Visits | 13.1M | 319.0K | amazon.jobs |
| MoM Change | +9% | -6% | amazon.jobs |
| Avg. Session | 3m40s | 0m41s | amazon.jobs |
| Pages / Visit | 5.0 | 1.8 | amazon.jobs |
Growth Momentum · Insight
amazon.science is losing traffic (-6%) despite 319.0K monthly visits. amazon.jobs's +9% growth puts it on a trajectory to overtake.
Acquisition Strategy
| amazon.jobs | amazon.science | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary Channel | Direct 38% | Search 43% | |
| Bounce Rate | 35.2% | 49.6% | amazon.jobs |
| SEO & Keywords | 30 | 30 | — |
Keyword Overlap Rate: 216%
| Keyword | Volume | amazon.jobs | amazon.science |
|---|---|---|---|
| amazinne.com | 54.7K | #2 | #10 |
Acquisition Strategy · Insight
amazon.jobs acquires users primarily through Direct (38%), while amazon.science relies on Search (43%). This reflects fundamentally different go-to-market strategies — amazon.jobs's higher direct traffic suggests stronger brand recognition or product-led growth, while amazon.science's search reliance means growth is more scalable but more vulnerable to algorithm changes.
Business Maturity
| amazon.jobs | amazon.science | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Domain Age | 20y 11m | 11y 7m | amazon.jobs |
| Registered | Sep 2005 | Feb 2015 | |
| Expires | Sep 2026 | Feb 2027 |
Business Maturity · Insight
amazon.jobs has been in the market for over a decade, indicating established presence.
Market Position
| amazon.jobs | amazon.science | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Global Rank | #3.6K | #168.6K | amazon.jobs |
| Category Rank | #18 | #90 | amazon.jobs |
| PH Upvotes | — | 126 |
amazon.jobs only
amazon.science only
Market Position · Insight
Each has untapped markets the other serves: amazon.jobs could expand into Mexico, while amazon.science could target Canada.
Key Takeaways
- •amazon.science is losing traffic (-6%) despite 319.0K monthly visits. amazon.jobs's +9% growth puts it on a trajectory to overtake.
- •amazon.jobs acquires users primarily through Direct (38%), while amazon.science relies on Search (43%). This reflects fundamentally different go-to-market strategies — amazon.jobs's higher direct traffic suggests stronger brand recognition or product-led growth, while amazon.science's search reliance means growth is more scalable but more vulnerable to algorithm changes.
- •amazon.jobs receives 41.0x more monthly traffic than amazon.science (13.1M vs 319.0K).
- •amazon.jobs is growing (+9%) while amazon.science is declining (-6%).
- •amazon.jobs keeps visitors significantly longer (3m40s avg session vs amazon.science's 0m41s), suggesting deeper product engagement or stickier content.
- •amazon.jobs has a 14 percentage point lower bounce rate (35% vs 50%), indicating better landing page relevance or more targeted traffic.
You've seen the gap. Now steal the playbook.
A Growth Teardown reverse-engineers exactly how each product grows — traffic sources, backlink strategy, keyword gaps, and scored action items you can copy this week.
Related Comparisons
Report based on data from July 2026