amazonaws.com vs flashscore.com
Market traction comparison · Updated Jul 2026
amazonaws.com| amazonaws.com | flashscore.com | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Monthly Visits | 117.4M | 47.3M | amazonaws.com |
| Bounce Rate | 57.8% | 41.3% | flashscore.com |
| SEO & Keywords | 30 | 30 | Tie |
| Domain Age | 21y | 23y 12m | flashscore.com |
flashscore.com leads in 2 of 4 dimensions, while amazonaws.com leads in 1.
Growth Momentum
| amazonaws.com | flashscore.com | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Monthly Visits | 117.4M | 47.3M | amazonaws.com |
| MoM Change | +3% | -12% | amazonaws.com |
| Avg. Session | 3m58s | 6m52s | flashscore.com |
| Pages / Visit | 3.1 | 6.3 | flashscore.com |
Growth Momentum · Insight
amazonaws.com is growing faster (+3%) but visitors stay 1.7x shorter (3m58s vs 6m52s). Rapid growth with declining engagement depth often signals lower-quality traffic or shallow product usage.
Acquisition Strategy
| amazonaws.com | flashscore.com | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary Channel | Direct 28% | Direct 75% | |
| Bounce Rate | 57.8% | 41.3% | flashscore.com |
| SEO & Keywords | 30 | 30 | — |
Keyword Overlap Rate: 186%
Acquisition Strategy · Insight
amazonaws.com acquires users primarily through Direct (28%), while flashscore.com relies on Direct (75%). This reflects fundamentally different go-to-market strategies — flashscore.com's higher direct traffic suggests stronger brand recognition or product-led growth, while flashscore.com's search reliance means growth is more scalable but more vulnerable to algorithm changes.
Business Maturity
| amazonaws.com | flashscore.com | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Domain Age | 21y | 23y 12m | flashscore.com |
| Registered | Aug 2005 | Sep 2002 | |
| Expires | Jan 2027 | Sep 2032 |
Business Maturity · Insight
flashscore.com has been in the market for over a decade, indicating established presence.
Market Position
| amazonaws.com | flashscore.com | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Global Rank | #369 | #931 | amazonaws.com |
| Category Rank | #22 | #7 | flashscore.com |
| PH Upvotes | 8 | — |
amazonaws.com only
flashscore.com only
Market Position · Insight
Each has untapped markets the other serves: amazonaws.com could expand into Georgia, Indonesia, Serbia, while flashscore.com could target India, Japan, Brazil.
Key Takeaways
- •flashscore.com is losing traffic (-12%) despite 47.3M monthly visits. amazonaws.com's +3% growth puts it on a trajectory to overtake.
- •amazonaws.com is growing faster (+3%) but visitors stay 1.7x shorter (3m58s vs 6m52s). Rapid growth with declining engagement depth often signals lower-quality traffic or shallow product usage.
- •amazonaws.com acquires users primarily through Direct (28%), while flashscore.com relies on Direct (75%). This reflects fundamentally different go-to-market strategies — flashscore.com's higher direct traffic suggests stronger brand recognition or product-led growth, while flashscore.com's search reliance means growth is more scalable but more vulnerable to algorithm changes.
- •amazonaws.com receives 2.5x more monthly traffic than flashscore.com (117.4M vs 47.3M).
- •amazonaws.com is growing (+3%) while flashscore.com is declining (-12%).
- •flashscore.com keeps visitors significantly longer (6m52s avg session vs amazonaws.com's 3m58s), suggesting deeper product engagement or stickier content.
You've seen the gap. Now steal the playbook.
A Growth Teardown reverse-engineers exactly how each product grows — traffic sources, backlink strategy, keyword gaps, and scored action items you can copy this week.
Related Comparisons
Report based on data from July 2026