apache.org vs merriam-webster.com
Market traction comparison · Updated Jul 2026
| apache.org | merriam-webster.com | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Monthly Visits | 3.5M | 61.9M | merriam-webster.com |
| Bounce Rate | 43.6% | 53.8% | apache.org |
| Domain Age | 31y 4m | 27y 6m | apache.org |
apache.org leads in 2 of 3 dimensions, while merriam-webster.com leads in 1.
Growth Momentum
| apache.org | merriam-webster.com | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Monthly Visits | 3.5M | 61.9M | merriam-webster.com |
| MoM Change | -3% | +4% | merriam-webster.com |
| Avg. Session | 2m27s | 3m14s | merriam-webster.com |
| Pages / Visit | 4.0 | 2.9 | apache.org |
Growth Momentum · Insight
apache.org is losing traffic (-3%) despite 3.5M monthly visits. merriam-webster.com's +4% growth puts it on a trajectory to overtake.
Acquisition Strategy
| apache.org | merriam-webster.com | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary Channel | Search 47% | Search 68% | |
| Bounce Rate | 43.6% | 53.8% | apache.org |
Acquisition Strategy · Insight
apache.org acquires users primarily through Search (47%), while merriam-webster.com relies on Search (68%). This reflects fundamentally different go-to-market strategies — apache.org's higher direct traffic suggests stronger brand recognition or product-led growth, while merriam-webster.com's search reliance means growth is more scalable but more vulnerable to algorithm changes.
Business Maturity
| apache.org | merriam-webster.com | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Domain Age | 31y 4m | 27y 6m | apache.org |
| Registered | Apr 1995 | Feb 1999 | |
| Expires | Apr 2029 | Feb 2027 |
Business Maturity · Insight
apache.org has been in the market for over a decade, indicating established presence.
Market Position
| apache.org | merriam-webster.com | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Global Rank | #14.9K | #824 | merriam-webster.com |
| Category Rank | — | #3 | |
| PH Upvotes | 16 | — |
apache.org only
merriam-webster.com only
Market Position · Insight
merriam-webster.com is heavily concentrated in United States (62%), creating dependency risk on a single market. apache.org has a more diversified audience.
Each has untapped markets the other serves: apache.org could expand into United Kingdom, Canada, Philippines, while merriam-webster.com could target China, Germany, South Korea.
Key Takeaways
- •apache.org is losing traffic (-3%) despite 3.5M monthly visits. merriam-webster.com's +4% growth puts it on a trajectory to overtake.
- •apache.org acquires users primarily through Search (47%), while merriam-webster.com relies on Search (68%). This reflects fundamentally different go-to-market strategies — apache.org's higher direct traffic suggests stronger brand recognition or product-led growth, while merriam-webster.com's search reliance means growth is more scalable but more vulnerable to algorithm changes.
- •merriam-webster.com receives 17.5x more monthly traffic than apache.org (61.9M vs 3.5M).
- •merriam-webster.com is growing (+4%) while apache.org is declining (-3%).
- •apache.org has a 10 percentage point lower bounce rate (44% vs 54%), indicating better landing page relevance or more targeted traffic.
- •merriam-webster.com depends on a single country for 62% of traffic, while apache.org is spread across more markets — lower geographic risk.
You've seen the gap. Now steal the playbook.
A Growth Teardown reverse-engineers exactly how each product grows — traffic sources, backlink strategy, keyword gaps, and scored action items you can copy this week.
Related Comparisons
Report based on data from July 2026