arena.ai vs lmarena.ai
Market traction comparison · Updated Jul 2026
| arena.ai | lmarena.ai | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Monthly Visits | 31.8M | 414.7K | arena.ai |
| Bounce Rate | 34.8% | 78.6% | arena.ai |
| SEO & Keywords | 30 | 34 | lmarena.ai |
| Domain Age | 8y 8m | 2y 2m | arena.ai |
arena.ai leads in 3 of 4 dimensions, while lmarena.ai leads in 1.
Growth Momentum
| arena.ai | lmarena.ai | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Monthly Visits | 31.8M | 414.7K | arena.ai |
| MoM Change | -1% | -3% | arena.ai |
| Avg. Session | 8m51s | 1m16s | arena.ai |
| Pages / Visit | 6.8 | 1.2 | arena.ai |
Growth Momentum · Insight
arena.ai receives 76.6x more monthly traffic than lmarena.ai (31.8M vs 414.7K).
Acquisition Strategy
| arena.ai | lmarena.ai | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary Channel | Direct 70% | Direct 69% | |
| Bounce Rate | 34.8% | 78.6% | arena.ai |
| SEO & Keywords | 30 | 34 | lmarena.ai |
Keyword Overlap Rate: 0%
Acquisition Strategy · Insight
arena.ai acquires users primarily through Direct (70%), while lmarena.ai relies on Direct (69%). This reflects fundamentally different go-to-market strategies — arena.ai's higher direct traffic suggests stronger brand recognition or product-led growth, while arena.ai's search reliance means growth is more scalable but more vulnerable to algorithm changes.
Business Maturity
| arena.ai | lmarena.ai | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Domain Age | 8y 8m | 2y 2m | arena.ai |
| Registered | Dec 2017 | Jun 2024 | |
| Expires | May 2028 | Jun 2028 |
Business Maturity · Insight
arena.ai has a 7-year head start, but lmarena.ai's trajectory shows steady market presence.
Market Position
| arena.ai | lmarena.ai | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Global Rank | #1.4K | #163.2K | arena.ai |
| Category Rank | #25 | #2.2K | arena.ai |
| PH Upvotes | 284 | 3 | arena.ai |
arena.ai only
lmarena.ai only
Market Position · Insight
lmarena.ai is heavily concentrated in China (73%), creating dependency risk on a single market. arena.ai has a more diversified audience.
Each has untapped markets the other serves: arena.ai could expand into China, while lmarena.ai could target Russia.
Key Takeaways
- •arena.ai receives 76.6x more monthly traffic than lmarena.ai (31.8M vs 414.7K).
- •arena.ai acquires users primarily through Direct (70%), while lmarena.ai relies on Direct (69%). This reflects fundamentally different go-to-market strategies — arena.ai's higher direct traffic suggests stronger brand recognition or product-led growth, while arena.ai's search reliance means growth is more scalable but more vulnerable to algorithm changes.
- •arena.ai receives 76.6x more monthly traffic than lmarena.ai (31.8M vs 414.7K).
- •arena.ai keeps visitors significantly longer (8m51s avg session vs lmarena.ai's 1m16s), suggesting deeper product engagement or stickier content.
- •arena.ai has a 44 percentage point lower bounce rate (35% vs 79%), indicating better landing page relevance or more targeted traffic.
- •With only 0% keyword overlap, they target largely different search audiences.
You've seen the gap. Now steal the playbook.
A Growth Teardown reverse-engineers exactly how each product grows — traffic sources, backlink strategy, keyword gaps, and scored action items you can copy this week.
Related Comparisons
Report based on data from July 2026