arena.im vs galaxy.ai
Market traction comparison · Updated Jul 2026
| arena.im | galaxy.ai | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Monthly Visits | 196.6K | 150.5K | arena.im |
| Bounce Rate | 41.6% | 39.0% | galaxy.ai |
| SEO & Keywords | 35 | 30 | arena.im |
| Domain Age | — | 8y 8m |
arena.im leads in 2 of 3 dimensions, while galaxy.ai leads in 1.
Growth Momentum
| arena.im | galaxy.ai | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Monthly Visits | 196.6K | 150.5K | arena.im |
| MoM Change | +1% | -46% | arena.im |
| Avg. Session | 0m21s | 0m13s | arena.im |
| Pages / Visit | 1.6 | 1.6 | arena.im |
Growth Momentum · Insight
galaxy.ai is losing traffic (-46%) despite 150.5K monthly visits. arena.im's +1% growth puts it on a trajectory to overtake.
Acquisition Strategy
| arena.im | galaxy.ai | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary Channel | Direct 71% | Search 46% | |
| Bounce Rate | 41.6% | 39.0% | galaxy.ai |
| SEO & Keywords | 35 | 30 | arena.im |
Keyword Overlap Rate: 225%
Acquisition Strategy · Insight
arena.im acquires users primarily through Direct (71%), while galaxy.ai relies on Search (46%). This reflects fundamentally different go-to-market strategies — arena.im's higher direct traffic suggests stronger brand recognition or product-led growth, while galaxy.ai's search reliance means growth is more scalable but more vulnerable to algorithm changes.
Business Maturity
| arena.im | galaxy.ai | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Domain Age | — | 8y 8m | |
| Registered | — | Dec 2017 | |
| Expires | — | Sep 2026 |
Market Position
| arena.im | galaxy.ai | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Global Rank | #255.7K | #317.3K | arena.im |
| Category Rank | #4.0K | #2.1K | galaxy.ai |
| PH Upvotes | — | 13 |
arena.im only
galaxy.ai only
Market Position · Insight
Each has untapped markets the other serves: arena.im could expand into Brazil, Uzbekistan, while galaxy.ai could target Mexico, Australia.
Key Takeaways
- •galaxy.ai is losing traffic (-46%) despite 150.5K monthly visits. arena.im's +1% growth puts it on a trajectory to overtake.
- •arena.im acquires users primarily through Direct (71%), while galaxy.ai relies on Search (46%). This reflects fundamentally different go-to-market strategies — arena.im's higher direct traffic suggests stronger brand recognition or product-led growth, while galaxy.ai's search reliance means growth is more scalable but more vulnerable to algorithm changes.
- •arena.im has 1.3x more traffic (196.6K vs 150.5K), though both operate at comparable scale.
- •arena.im is growing (+1%) while galaxy.ai is declining (-46%).
- •arena.im keeps visitors significantly longer (0m21s avg session vs galaxy.ai's 0m13s), suggesting deeper product engagement or stickier content.
- •arena.im acquires traffic primarily through Direct (71%), while galaxy.ai relies on Search (46%) — fundamentally different acquisition strategies.
You've seen the gap. Now steal the playbook.
A Growth Teardown reverse-engineers exactly how each product grows — traffic sources, backlink strategy, keyword gaps, and scored action items you can copy this week.
Related Comparisons
Report based on data from July 2026