Artevia vs Decoratly
Market traction comparison · Updated Jul 2026
| Artevia | Decoratly | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Monthly Visits | 670 | 29.9K | Decoratly |
| Bounce Rate | 33.1% | 45.3% | Artevia |
| Est. MRR | $0 | $0 | Tie |
| SEO & Keywords | 25 | 35 | Decoratly |
| Domain Age | 1y 3m | 2y 9m | Decoratly |
Decoratly leads in 3 of 5 dimensions, while Artevia leads in 1.
Growth Momentum
| Artevia | Decoratly | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Monthly Visits | 670 | 29.9K | Decoratly |
| MoM Change | -30% | -20% | Decoratly |
| Avg. Session | 1m23s | 0m47s | Artevia |
| Pages / Visit | 2.6 | 3.0 | Decoratly |
Growth Momentum · Insight
Decoratly is growing faster (-20%) but visitors stay 1.8x shorter (0m47s vs 1m23s). Rapid growth with declining engagement depth often signals lower-quality traffic or shallow product usage.
Acquisition Strategy
| Artevia | Decoratly | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary Channel | — | Search 92% | |
| Bounce Rate | 33.1% | 45.3% | Artevia |
| SEO & Keywords | 25 | 35 | Decoratly |
Keyword Overlap Rate: 7%
Business Maturity
Revenue estimates are derived from public data sources. Actual figures may differ.
| Artevia | Decoratly | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Est. MRR | $0 | $0 | — |
| Revenue / Visit | $0.000 | $0.000 | — |
| Domain Age | 1y 3m | 2y 9m | Decoratly |
| Registered | Jun 2025 | Nov 2023 | |
| Expires | Jun 2027 | Nov 2026 |
Business Maturity · Insight
Decoratly has been in the market 2 years longer (3y vs 1y). Decoratly's longer track record suggests established operations, while Artevia's entry timing indicates the market still attracts new players.
Market Position
| Artevia | Decoratly | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Global Rank | #8.6M | #844.4K | Decoratly |
| Category Rank | — | #76 | |
| PH Upvotes | 6 | 8 | Decoratly |
Market Position · Insight
Each has untapped markets the other serves: Artevia could expand into United States, United Kingdom, Netherlands, while Decoratly could target Switzerland.
Key Takeaways
- •Decoratly receives 44.6x more monthly traffic than Artevia (29.9K vs 670).
- •Decoratly is growing faster (-20%) but visitors stay 1.8x shorter (0m47s vs 1m23s). Rapid growth with declining engagement depth often signals lower-quality traffic or shallow product usage.
- •Decoratly receives 44.6x more monthly traffic than Artevia (29.9K vs 670).
- •Artevia keeps visitors significantly longer (1m23s avg session vs Decoratly's 0m47s), suggesting deeper product engagement or stickier content.
- •Artevia has a 12 percentage point lower bounce rate (33% vs 45%), indicating better landing page relevance or more targeted traffic.
- •With only 7% keyword overlap, they target largely different search audiences.
You've seen the gap. Now steal the playbook.
A Growth Teardown reverse-engineers exactly how each product grows — traffic sources, backlink strategy, keyword gaps, and scored action items you can copy this week.
Related Comparisons
Report based on data from July 2026