beart.ai vs live3d.io
Market traction comparison · Updated Jul 2026
| beart.ai | live3d.io | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Monthly Visits | 389.7K | 1.6M | live3d.io |
| Bounce Rate | 38.2% | 40.6% | beart.ai |
| SEO & Keywords | 29 | 35 | live3d.io |
| Domain Age | 1y 9m | 8y 3m | live3d.io |
live3d.io leads in 3 of 4 dimensions, while beart.ai leads in 1.
Growth Momentum
| beart.ai | live3d.io | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Monthly Visits | 389.7K | 1.6M | live3d.io |
| MoM Change | -22% | +14% | live3d.io |
| Avg. Session | 2m22s | 5m06s | live3d.io |
| Pages / Visit | 3.4 | 4.9 | live3d.io |
Growth Momentum · Insight
beart.ai is losing traffic (-22%) despite 389.7K monthly visits. live3d.io's +14% growth puts it on a trajectory to overtake.
Acquisition Strategy
| beart.ai | live3d.io | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary Channel | Direct 76% | Direct 65% | |
| Bounce Rate | 38.2% | 40.6% | beart.ai |
| SEO & Keywords | 29 | 35 | live3d.io |
Keyword Overlap Rate: 36%
| Keyword | Volume | beart.ai | live3d.io |
|---|---|---|---|
| gif face swap free | 1.1K | #6 | #3 |
Acquisition Strategy · Insight
beart.ai acquires users primarily through Direct (76%), while live3d.io relies on Direct (65%). This reflects fundamentally different go-to-market strategies — beart.ai's higher direct traffic suggests stronger brand recognition or product-led growth, while live3d.io's search reliance means growth is more scalable but more vulnerable to algorithm changes.
Business Maturity
| beart.ai | live3d.io | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Domain Age | 1y 9m | 8y 3m | live3d.io |
| Registered | Nov 2024 | May 2018 | |
| Expires | Nov 2026 | May 2028 |
Business Maturity · Insight
live3d.io has a 7-year head start, but beart.ai's trajectory shows steady market presence.
Market Position
| beart.ai | live3d.io | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Global Rank | #115.7K | #31.5K | live3d.io |
| Category Rank | #497 | #878 | beart.ai |
| PH Upvotes | 8 | 6 | beart.ai |
beart.ai only
live3d.io only
Market Position · Insight
Each has untapped markets the other serves: beart.ai could expand into Canada, China, while live3d.io could target Russia, Ukraine.
Key Takeaways
- •beart.ai is losing traffic (-22%) despite 389.7K monthly visits. live3d.io's +14% growth puts it on a trajectory to overtake.
- •beart.ai acquires users primarily through Direct (76%), while live3d.io relies on Direct (65%). This reflects fundamentally different go-to-market strategies — beart.ai's higher direct traffic suggests stronger brand recognition or product-led growth, while live3d.io's search reliance means growth is more scalable but more vulnerable to algorithm changes.
- •live3d.io receives 4.0x more monthly traffic than beart.ai (1.6M vs 389.7K).
- •live3d.io is growing (+14%) while beart.ai is declining (-22%).
- •live3d.io keeps visitors significantly longer (5m06s avg session vs beart.ai's 2m22s), suggesting deeper product engagement or stickier content.
- •They share 17 keywords (36% overlap), indicating direct search competition.
You've seen the gap. Now steal the playbook.
A Growth Teardown reverse-engineers exactly how each product grows — traffic sources, backlink strategy, keyword gaps, and scored action items you can copy this week.
Related Comparisons
Report based on data from July 2026