behindthename.com vs bin.sh
Market traction comparison · Updated Jul 2026
| behindthename.com | bin.sh | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Monthly Visits | 3.9M | 569.4K | behindthename.com |
| Bounce Rate | 40.8% | 44.8% | behindthename.com |
| SEO & Keywords | 30 | 30 | Tie |
| Domain Age | 26y 8m | 22y 10m | behindthename.com |
behindthename.com leads in 3 of 4 dimensions, while bin.sh leads in 0.
Growth Momentum
| behindthename.com | bin.sh | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Monthly Visits | 3.9M | 569.4K | behindthename.com |
| MoM Change | +11% | -3% | behindthename.com |
| Avg. Session | 3m39s | 1m23s | behindthename.com |
| Pages / Visit | 6.8 | 2.6 | behindthename.com |
Growth Momentum · Insight
bin.sh is losing traffic (-3%) despite 569.4K monthly visits. behindthename.com's +11% growth puts it on a trajectory to overtake.
Acquisition Strategy
| behindthename.com | bin.sh | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary Channel | Search 61% | Search 44% | |
| Bounce Rate | 40.8% | 44.8% | behindthename.com |
| SEO & Keywords | 30 | 30 | — |
Keyword Overlap Rate: 150%
Acquisition Strategy · Insight
behindthename.com acquires users primarily through Search (61%), while bin.sh relies on Search (44%). This reflects fundamentally different go-to-market strategies — bin.sh's higher direct traffic suggests stronger brand recognition or product-led growth, while behindthename.com's search reliance means growth is more scalable but more vulnerable to algorithm changes.
Business Maturity
| behindthename.com | bin.sh | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Domain Age | 26y 8m | 22y 10m | behindthename.com |
| Registered | Dec 1999 | Oct 2003 | |
| Expires | Dec 2033 | Oct 2026 |
Business Maturity · Insight
behindthename.com has been in the market for over a decade, indicating established presence.
Market Position
| behindthename.com | bin.sh | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Global Rank | #10.7K | #93.0K | behindthename.com |
| Category Rank | #16 | #76 | behindthename.com |
behindthename.com only
bin.sh only
Market Position · Insight
Each has untapped markets the other serves: behindthename.com could expand into Germany, while bin.sh could target Russia.
Key Takeaways
- •bin.sh is losing traffic (-3%) despite 569.4K monthly visits. behindthename.com's +11% growth puts it on a trajectory to overtake.
- •behindthename.com acquires users primarily through Search (61%), while bin.sh relies on Search (44%). This reflects fundamentally different go-to-market strategies — bin.sh's higher direct traffic suggests stronger brand recognition or product-led growth, while behindthename.com's search reliance means growth is more scalable but more vulnerable to algorithm changes.
- •behindthename.com receives 6.8x more monthly traffic than bin.sh (3.9M vs 569.4K).
- •behindthename.com is growing (+11%) while bin.sh is declining (-3%).
- •behindthename.com keeps visitors significantly longer (3m39s avg session vs bin.sh's 1m23s), suggesting deeper product engagement or stickier content.
- •They share 36 keywords (150% overlap), indicating direct search competition.
You've seen the gap. Now steal the playbook.
A Growth Teardown reverse-engineers exactly how each product grows — traffic sources, backlink strategy, keyword gaps, and scored action items you can copy this week.
Related Comparisons
Report based on data from July 2026