bolt.new vs emergent.sh
Market traction comparison · Updated Jul 2026
| bolt.new | emergent.sh | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Monthly Visits | 3.8M | 9.2M | emergent.sh |
| Bounce Rate | 36.3% | 34.3% | emergent.sh |
| Domain Rating | 82 | — | |
| SEO & Keywords | 35 | 35 | Tie |
| Domain Age | 2y 1m | 2y 2m | emergent.sh |
emergent.sh leads in 3 of 4 dimensions, while bolt.new leads in 0.
Growth Momentum
| bolt.new | emergent.sh | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Monthly Visits | 3.8M | 9.2M | emergent.sh |
| MoM Change | -2% | +24% | emergent.sh |
| Avg. Session | 13m44s | 5m00s | bolt.new |
| Pages / Visit | 6.3 | 4.8 | bolt.new |
Growth Momentum · Insight
emergent.sh is growing faster (+24%) but visitors stay 2.7x shorter (5m00s vs 13m44s). Rapid growth with declining engagement depth often signals lower-quality traffic or shallow product usage.
Acquisition Strategy
| bolt.new | emergent.sh | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary Channel | Direct 67% | Search 47% | |
| Bounce Rate | 36.3% | 34.3% | emergent.sh |
| SEO & Keywords | 35 | 35 | — |
Keyword Overlap Rate: 169%
Acquisition Strategy · Insight
bolt.new acquires users primarily through Direct (67%), while emergent.sh relies on Search (47%). This reflects fundamentally different go-to-market strategies — bolt.new's higher direct traffic suggests stronger brand recognition or product-led growth, while emergent.sh's search reliance means growth is more scalable but more vulnerable to algorithm changes.
Business Maturity
| bolt.new | emergent.sh | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Domain Age | 2y 1m | 2y 2m | emergent.sh |
| Registered | Jul 2024 | Jun 2024 | |
| Expires | Jul 2026 | Jun 2027 |
Business Maturity · Insight
emergent.sh has been in the market 0 years longer (2y vs 2y). emergent.sh's longer track record suggests established operations, while bolt.new's entry timing indicates the market still attracts new players.
Market Position
| bolt.new | emergent.sh | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Domain Rating | 82 | — | |
| Global Rank | #12.9K | #5.7K | emergent.sh |
| Category Rank | #31 | #46 | bolt.new |
| PH Upvotes | 752 | 582 | bolt.new |
bolt.new only
emergent.sh only
Market Position · Insight
Each has untapped markets the other serves: bolt.new could expand into United Kingdom, Indonesia, Italy, while emergent.sh could target Brazil, Germany, Canada.
Key Takeaways
- •bolt.new is losing traffic (-2%) despite 3.8M monthly visits. emergent.sh's +24% growth puts it on a trajectory to overtake.
- •emergent.sh is growing faster (+24%) but visitors stay 2.7x shorter (5m00s vs 13m44s). Rapid growth with declining engagement depth often signals lower-quality traffic or shallow product usage.
- •bolt.new acquires users primarily through Direct (67%), while emergent.sh relies on Search (47%). This reflects fundamentally different go-to-market strategies — bolt.new's higher direct traffic suggests stronger brand recognition or product-led growth, while emergent.sh's search reliance means growth is more scalable but more vulnerable to algorithm changes.
- •emergent.sh receives 2.4x more monthly traffic than bolt.new (9.2M vs 3.8M).
- •emergent.sh is growing (+24%) while bolt.new is declining (-2%).
- •bolt.new keeps visitors significantly longer (13m44s avg session vs emergent.sh's 5m00s), suggesting deeper product engagement or stickier content.
You've seen the gap. Now steal the playbook.
A Growth Teardown reverse-engineers exactly how each product grows — traffic sources, backlink strategy, keyword gaps, and scored action items you can copy this week.
Related Comparisons
Report based on data from July 2026