bubble.io vs emergent.sh
Market traction comparison · Updated Jul 2026
| bubble.io | emergent.sh | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Monthly Visits | 2.0M | 9.2M | emergent.sh |
| Bounce Rate | 31.6% | 34.3% | bubble.io |
| Domain Rating | 86 | — | |
| SEO & Keywords | 35 | 35 | Tie |
| Domain Age | 18y 8m | 2y 2m | bubble.io |
bubble.io leads in 2 of 4 dimensions, while emergent.sh leads in 1.
Growth Momentum
| bubble.io | emergent.sh | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Monthly Visits | 2.0M | 9.2M | emergent.sh |
| MoM Change | -17% | +24% | emergent.sh |
| Avg. Session | 10m49s | 5m00s | bubble.io |
| Pages / Visit | 16.0 | 4.8 | bubble.io |
Growth Momentum · Insight
emergent.sh is growing faster (+24%) but visitors stay 2.2x shorter (5m00s vs 10m49s). Rapid growth with declining engagement depth often signals lower-quality traffic or shallow product usage.
Acquisition Strategy
| bubble.io | emergent.sh | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary Channel | Direct 62% | Search 47% | |
| Bounce Rate | 31.6% | 34.3% | bubble.io |
| SEO & Keywords | 35 | 35 | — |
Keyword Overlap Rate: 79%
Acquisition Strategy · Insight
bubble.io acquires users primarily through Direct (62%), while emergent.sh relies on Search (47%). This reflects fundamentally different go-to-market strategies — bubble.io's higher direct traffic suggests stronger brand recognition or product-led growth, while emergent.sh's search reliance means growth is more scalable but more vulnerable to algorithm changes.
Business Maturity
| bubble.io | emergent.sh | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Domain Age | 18y 8m | 2y 2m | bubble.io |
| Registered | Jan 2008 | Jun 2024 | |
| Expires | Apr 2029 | Jun 2027 |
Business Maturity · Insight
bubble.io has been in the market for over a decade, indicating established presence.
Market Position
| bubble.io | emergent.sh | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Domain Rating | 86 | — | |
| Global Rank | #14.2K | #5.7K | emergent.sh |
| Category Rank | #375 | #46 | emergent.sh |
| PH Upvotes | 19 | 582 | emergent.sh |
bubble.io only
emergent.sh only
Market Position · Insight
Each has untapped markets the other serves: bubble.io could expand into Indonesia, Italy, while emergent.sh could target Brazil, France.
Key Takeaways
- •bubble.io is losing traffic (-17%) despite 2.0M monthly visits. emergent.sh's +24% growth puts it on a trajectory to overtake.
- •emergent.sh is growing faster (+24%) but visitors stay 2.2x shorter (5m00s vs 10m49s). Rapid growth with declining engagement depth often signals lower-quality traffic or shallow product usage.
- •bubble.io acquires users primarily through Direct (62%), while emergent.sh relies on Search (47%). This reflects fundamentally different go-to-market strategies — bubble.io's higher direct traffic suggests stronger brand recognition or product-led growth, while emergent.sh's search reliance means growth is more scalable but more vulnerable to algorithm changes.
- •emergent.sh receives 4.5x more monthly traffic than bubble.io (9.2M vs 2.0M).
- •emergent.sh is growing (+24%) while bubble.io is declining (-17%).
- •bubble.io keeps visitors significantly longer (10m49s avg session vs emergent.sh's 5m00s), suggesting deeper product engagement or stickier content.
You've seen the gap. Now steal the playbook.
A Growth Teardown reverse-engineers exactly how each product grows — traffic sources, backlink strategy, keyword gaps, and scored action items you can copy this week.
Related Comparisons
Report based on data from July 2026