cal.com vs calendar.com
Market traction comparison · Updated Jul 2026
| cal.com | calendar.com | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Monthly Visits | 3.8M | 197.5K | cal.com |
| Bounce Rate | 37.4% | 45.0% | cal.com |
| SEO & Keywords | 35 | 30 | cal.com |
| Domain Age | 29y 3m | 27y 4m | cal.com |
cal.com leads in 4 of 4 dimensions, while calendar.com leads in 0.
Growth Momentum
| cal.com | calendar.com | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Monthly Visits | 3.8M | 197.5K | cal.com |
| MoM Change | +4% | +10% | calendar.com |
| Avg. Session | 2m54s | 0m24s | cal.com |
| Pages / Visit | 5.6 | 1.6 | cal.com |
Growth Momentum · Insight
calendar.com is growing +10% while cal.com grows +4%. At current trajectory, calendar.com could close the traffic gap within 27 months.
Acquisition Strategy
| cal.com | calendar.com | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary Channel | Direct 68% | Direct 68% | |
| Bounce Rate | 37.4% | 45.0% | cal.com |
| SEO & Keywords | 35 | 30 | cal.com |
Keyword Overlap Rate: 124%
| Keyword | Volume | cal.com | calendar.com |
|---|---|---|---|
| calen | 36.5K | #9 | #7 |
| calen' | 1.3K | #10 | #8 |
Acquisition Strategy · Insight
cal.com acquires users primarily through Direct (68%), while calendar.com relies on Direct (68%). This reflects fundamentally different go-to-market strategies — calendar.com's higher direct traffic suggests stronger brand recognition or product-led growth, while calendar.com's search reliance means growth is more scalable but more vulnerable to algorithm changes.
Business Maturity
| cal.com | calendar.com | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Domain Age | 29y 3m | 27y 4m | cal.com |
| Registered | May 1997 | May 1999 | |
| Expires | May 2034 | May 2033 |
Business Maturity · Insight
cal.com has been in the market for over a decade, indicating established presence.
Market Position
| cal.com | calendar.com | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Global Rank | #12.2K | #259.3K | cal.com |
| Category Rank | #205 | #3.4K | cal.com |
| PH Upvotes | 636 | — |
cal.com only
calendar.com only
Market Position · Insight
Each has untapped markets the other serves: cal.com could expand into United Kingdom, Australia, while calendar.com could target Germany, France.
Key Takeaways
- •calendar.com is growing +10% while cal.com grows +4%. At current trajectory, calendar.com could close the traffic gap within 27 months.
- •cal.com acquires users primarily through Direct (68%), while calendar.com relies on Direct (68%). This reflects fundamentally different go-to-market strategies — calendar.com's higher direct traffic suggests stronger brand recognition or product-led growth, while calendar.com's search reliance means growth is more scalable but more vulnerable to algorithm changes.
- •cal.com receives 19.2x more monthly traffic than calendar.com (3.8M vs 197.5K).
- •Both are growing, with calendar.com accelerating faster at +10% vs +4%.
- •cal.com keeps visitors significantly longer (2m54s avg session vs calendar.com's 0m24s), suggesting deeper product engagement or stickier content.
- •They share 36 keywords (124% overlap), indicating direct search competition.
You've seen the gap. Now steal the playbook.
A Growth Teardown reverse-engineers exactly how each product grows — traffic sources, backlink strategy, keyword gaps, and scored action items you can copy this week.
Related Comparisons
Report based on data from July 2026