charlemagnelabs.ai vs surf.security
Market traction comparison · Updated Jul 2026
| charlemagnelabs.ai | surf.security | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Monthly Visits | 929 | 16.3K | surf.security |
| Bounce Rate | 28.0% | 49.1% | charlemagnelabs.ai |
| SEO & Keywords | 30 | 30 | Tie |
| Domain Age | 1y 5m | 4y 10m | surf.security |
surf.security leads in 2 of 4 dimensions, while charlemagnelabs.ai leads in 1.
Growth Momentum
| charlemagnelabs.ai | surf.security | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Monthly Visits | 929 | 16.3K | surf.security |
| MoM Change | +19% | +75% | surf.security |
| Avg. Session | 2m08s | 0m42s | charlemagnelabs.ai |
| Pages / Visit | 4.3 | 1.4 | charlemagnelabs.ai |
Growth Momentum · Insight
surf.security is growing faster (+75%) but visitors stay 3.1x shorter (0m42s vs 2m08s). Rapid growth with declining engagement depth often signals lower-quality traffic or shallow product usage.
Acquisition Strategy
| charlemagnelabs.ai | surf.security | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary Channel | — | — | |
| Bounce Rate | 28.0% | 49.1% | charlemagnelabs.ai |
| SEO & Keywords | 30 | 30 | — |
Keyword Overlap Rate: 15%
Business Maturity
| charlemagnelabs.ai | surf.security | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Domain Age | 1y 5m | 4y 10m | surf.security |
| Registered | Mar 2025 | Nov 2021 | |
| Expires | Mar 2027 | Nov 2026 |
Business Maturity · Insight
surf.security has been in the market 3 years longer (5y vs 1y). surf.security's longer track record suggests established operations, while charlemagnelabs.ai's entry timing indicates the market still attracts new players.
Market Position
| charlemagnelabs.ai | surf.security | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Global Rank | #9.1M | #1.7M | surf.security |
| Category Rank | — | #1.0K |
surf.security only
Market Position · Insight
charlemagnelabs.ai is heavily concentrated in United States (100%), creating dependency risk on a single market. surf.security has a more diversified audience.
Key Takeaways
- •surf.security is growing +75% while charlemagnelabs.ai grows +19%. At current trajectory, surf.security could close the traffic gap within 1 months.
- •surf.security is growing faster (+75%) but visitors stay 3.1x shorter (0m42s vs 2m08s). Rapid growth with declining engagement depth often signals lower-quality traffic or shallow product usage.
- •surf.security receives 17.6x more monthly traffic than charlemagnelabs.ai (16.3K vs 929).
- •Both are growing, with surf.security accelerating faster at +75% vs +19%.
- •charlemagnelabs.ai keeps visitors significantly longer (2m08s avg session vs surf.security's 0m42s), suggesting deeper product engagement or stickier content.
- •charlemagnelabs.ai has a 21 percentage point lower bounce rate (28% vs 49%), indicating better landing page relevance or more targeted traffic.
You've seen the gap. Now steal the playbook.
A Growth Teardown reverse-engineers exactly how each product grows — traffic sources, backlink strategy, keyword gaps, and scored action items you can copy this week.
Related Comparisons
Report based on data from July 2026