chord.rocks vs improvis.io
Market traction comparison · Updated Jul 2026
| chord.rocks | improvis.io | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Monthly Visits | 254.5K | 3.9K | chord.rocks |
| Bounce Rate | 42.0% | 45.8% | chord.rocks |
| SEO & Keywords | 30 | 17 | chord.rocks |
| Domain Age | 10y 11m | 1y 2m | chord.rocks |
chord.rocks leads in 4 of 4 dimensions, while improvis.io leads in 0.
Growth Momentum
| chord.rocks | improvis.io | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Monthly Visits | 254.5K | 3.9K | chord.rocks |
| MoM Change | +6% | +36% | improvis.io |
| Avg. Session | 2m15s | 0m00s | chord.rocks |
| Pages / Visit | 4.8 | 1.1 | chord.rocks |
Growth Momentum · Insight
improvis.io is growing faster (+36%) but visitors stay Infinityx shorter (0m00s vs 2m15s). Rapid growth with declining engagement depth often signals lower-quality traffic or shallow product usage.
Acquisition Strategy
| chord.rocks | improvis.io | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary Channel | Direct 48% | — | |
| Bounce Rate | 42.0% | 45.8% | chord.rocks |
| SEO & Keywords | 30 | 17 | chord.rocks |
chord.rocks
Search 39%Direct 48%Social 8%Referral 5%
SearchDirectSocialReferralPaidEmail
36
chord.rocks OnlySharedimprovis.io Only
Keyword Overlap Rate: 327%
Business Maturity
| chord.rocks | improvis.io | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Domain Age | 10y 11m | 1y 2m | chord.rocks |
| Registered | Sep 2015 | Jun 2025 | |
| Expires | Sep 2026 | Jun 2026 |
Business Maturity · Insight
chord.rocks has been in the market for over a decade, indicating established presence.
Market Position
| chord.rocks | improvis.io | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Global Rank | #138.8K | #5.5M | chord.rocks |
| Category Rank | #717 | — | |
| PH Upvotes | — | 2 |
chord.rocksimprovis.io
🇺🇸 United States
34%
100%
chord.rocks only
🇩🇪 Germany 7%🇧🇷 Brazil 5%🇨🇦 Canada 4%
Key Takeaways
- •improvis.io is growing +36% while chord.rocks grows +6%. At current trajectory, improvis.io could close the traffic gap within 18 months.
- •improvis.io is growing faster (+36%) but visitors stay Infinityx shorter (0m00s vs 2m15s). Rapid growth with declining engagement depth often signals lower-quality traffic or shallow product usage.
- •chord.rocks receives 64.6x more monthly traffic than improvis.io (254.5K vs 3.9K).
- •Both are growing, with improvis.io accelerating faster at +36% vs +6%.
- •chord.rocks keeps visitors significantly longer (2m15s avg session vs improvis.io's 0m00s), suggesting deeper product engagement or stickier content.
- •They share 36 keywords (327% overlap), indicating direct search competition.
You've seen the gap. Now steal the playbook.
A Growth Teardown reverse-engineers exactly how each product grows — traffic sources, backlink strategy, keyword gaps, and scored action items you can copy this week.
Related Comparisons
Report based on data from July 2026