circleci.com vs span.app
Market traction comparison · Updated Jul 2026
| circleci.com | span.app | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Monthly Visits | 1.2M | 66.7K | circleci.com |
| Bounce Rate | 25.5% | 37.1% | circleci.com |
| SEO & Keywords | 30 | 30 | Tie |
| Domain Age | 14y 12m | 8y 4m | circleci.com |
circleci.com leads in 3 of 4 dimensions, while span.app leads in 0.
Growth Momentum
| circleci.com | span.app | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Monthly Visits | 1.2M | 66.7K | circleci.com |
| MoM Change | +5% | -1% | circleci.com |
| Avg. Session | 6m11s | 1m00s | circleci.com |
| Pages / Visit | 6.0 | 2.6 | circleci.com |
Growth Momentum · Insight
span.app is losing traffic (-1%) despite 66.7K monthly visits. circleci.com's +5% growth puts it on a trajectory to overtake.
Acquisition Strategy
| circleci.com | span.app | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary Channel | Direct 65% | Direct 55% | |
| Bounce Rate | 25.5% | 37.1% | circleci.com |
| SEO & Keywords | 30 | 30 | — |
Keyword Overlap Rate: 3%
Acquisition Strategy · Insight
circleci.com acquires users primarily through Direct (65%), while span.app relies on Direct (55%). This reflects fundamentally different go-to-market strategies — circleci.com's higher direct traffic suggests stronger brand recognition or product-led growth, while span.app's search reliance means growth is more scalable but more vulnerable to algorithm changes.
Business Maturity
| circleci.com | span.app | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Domain Age | 14y 12m | 8y 4m | circleci.com |
| Registered | Aug 2011 | May 2018 | |
| Expires | Aug 2026 | May 2026 |
Business Maturity · Insight
circleci.com has been in the market for over a decade, indicating established presence.
Market Position
| circleci.com | span.app | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Global Rank | #39.5K | #498.7K | circleci.com |
| Category Rank | #622 | #4.8K | circleci.com |
circleci.com only
span.app only
Market Position · Insight
Each has untapped markets the other serves: circleci.com could expand into Vietnam, Canada, Nigeria, while span.app could target United Kingdom, India, Japan.
Key Takeaways
- •span.app is losing traffic (-1%) despite 66.7K monthly visits. circleci.com's +5% growth puts it on a trajectory to overtake.
- •circleci.com acquires users primarily through Direct (65%), while span.app relies on Direct (55%). This reflects fundamentally different go-to-market strategies — circleci.com's higher direct traffic suggests stronger brand recognition or product-led growth, while span.app's search reliance means growth is more scalable but more vulnerable to algorithm changes.
- •circleci.com receives 17.4x more monthly traffic than span.app (1.2M vs 66.7K).
- •circleci.com is growing (+5%) while span.app is declining (-1%).
- •circleci.com keeps visitors significantly longer (6m11s avg session vs span.app's 1m00s), suggesting deeper product engagement or stickier content.
- •circleci.com has a 12 percentage point lower bounce rate (26% vs 37%), indicating better landing page relevance or more targeted traffic.
You've seen the gap. Now steal the playbook.
A Growth Teardown reverse-engineers exactly how each product grows — traffic sources, backlink strategy, keyword gaps, and scored action items you can copy this week.
Related Comparisons
Report based on data from July 2026