cloro.dev vs scrapfly.io
Market traction comparison · Updated Jul 2026
| cloro.dev | scrapfly.io | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Monthly Visits | 34.0K | 247.9K | scrapfly.io |
| Bounce Rate | 38.2% | 43.8% | cloro.dev |
| SEO & Keywords | 20 | 30 | scrapfly.io |
| Domain Age | 11m | 7y 11m | scrapfly.io |
scrapfly.io leads in 3 of 4 dimensions, while cloro.dev leads in 1.
Growth Momentum
| cloro.dev | scrapfly.io | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Monthly Visits | 34.0K | 247.9K | scrapfly.io |
| MoM Change | +86% | -10% | cloro.dev |
| Avg. Session | 0m58s | 0m54s | cloro.dev |
| Pages / Visit | 2.4 | 2.1 | cloro.dev |
Growth Momentum · Insight
scrapfly.io is losing traffic (-10%) despite 247.9K monthly visits. cloro.dev's +86% growth puts it on a trajectory to overtake.
Acquisition Strategy
| cloro.dev | scrapfly.io | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary Channel | Direct 67% | Search 60% | |
| Bounce Rate | 38.2% | 43.8% | cloro.dev |
| SEO & Keywords | 20 | 30 | scrapfly.io |
Keyword Overlap Rate: 32%
Acquisition Strategy · Insight
cloro.dev acquires users primarily through Direct (67%), while scrapfly.io relies on Search (60%). This reflects fundamentally different go-to-market strategies — cloro.dev's higher direct traffic suggests stronger brand recognition or product-led growth, while scrapfly.io's search reliance means growth is more scalable but more vulnerable to algorithm changes.
Business Maturity
| cloro.dev | scrapfly.io | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Domain Age | 11m | 7y 11m | scrapfly.io |
| Registered | Sep 2025 | Sep 2018 | |
| Expires | Sep 2026 | Sep 2026 |
Business Maturity · Insight
scrapfly.io has a 7-year head start, but cloro.dev's trajectory shows strong growth momentum.
Market Position
| cloro.dev | scrapfly.io | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Global Rank | #860.3K | #197.8K | scrapfly.io |
| Category Rank | — | #4.1K | |
| PH Upvotes | 9 | — |
cloro.dev only
scrapfly.io only
Market Position · Insight
Each has untapped markets the other serves: cloro.dev could expand into France, Brazil, Germany, while scrapfly.io could target Spain, South Korea, Vietnam.
Key Takeaways
- •scrapfly.io is losing traffic (-10%) despite 247.9K monthly visits. cloro.dev's +86% growth puts it on a trajectory to overtake.
- •cloro.dev acquires users primarily through Direct (67%), while scrapfly.io relies on Search (60%). This reflects fundamentally different go-to-market strategies — cloro.dev's higher direct traffic suggests stronger brand recognition or product-led growth, while scrapfly.io's search reliance means growth is more scalable but more vulnerable to algorithm changes.
- •scrapfly.io receives 7.3x more monthly traffic than cloro.dev (247.9K vs 34.0K).
- •cloro.dev is growing (+86%) while scrapfly.io is declining (-10%).
- •cloro.dev acquires traffic primarily through Direct (67%), while scrapfly.io relies on Search (60%) — fundamentally different acquisition strategies.
- •They share 12 keywords (32% overlap), indicating direct search competition.
You've seen the gap. Now steal the playbook.
A Growth Teardown reverse-engineers exactly how each product grows — traffic sources, backlink strategy, keyword gaps, and scored action items you can copy this week.
Related Comparisons
Report based on data from July 2026