cnyes.com vs udn.com
Market traction comparison · Updated Jul 2026
| cnyes.com | udn.com | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Monthly Visits | 11.9M | 42.5M | udn.com |
| Bounce Rate | 58.8% | 57.2% | udn.com |
| SEO & Keywords | 30 | 30 | Tie |
| Domain Age | 27y 2m | 27y 11m | udn.com |
udn.com leads in 3 of 4 dimensions, while cnyes.com leads in 0.
Growth Momentum
| cnyes.com | udn.com | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Monthly Visits | 11.9M | 42.5M | udn.com |
| MoM Change | -6% | +6% | udn.com |
| Avg. Session | 1m58s | 3m07s | udn.com |
| Pages / Visit | 2.3 | 2.4 | udn.com |
Growth Momentum · Insight
cnyes.com is losing traffic (-6%) despite 11.9M monthly visits. udn.com's +6% growth puts it on a trajectory to overtake.
Acquisition Strategy
| cnyes.com | udn.com | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary Channel | Direct 55% | Direct 44% | |
| Bounce Rate | 58.8% | 57.2% | udn.com |
| SEO & Keywords | 30 | 30 | — |
Keyword Overlap Rate: 7%
Acquisition Strategy · Insight
cnyes.com acquires users primarily through Direct (55%), while udn.com relies on Direct (44%). This reflects fundamentally different go-to-market strategies — cnyes.com's higher direct traffic suggests stronger brand recognition or product-led growth, while udn.com's search reliance means growth is more scalable but more vulnerable to algorithm changes.
Business Maturity
| cnyes.com | udn.com | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Domain Age | 27y 2m | 27y 11m | udn.com |
| Registered | Jun 1999 | Sep 1998 | |
| Expires | Jun 2028 | Sep 2031 |
Business Maturity · Insight
udn.com has been in the market for over a decade, indicating established presence.
Market Position
| cnyes.com | udn.com | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Global Rank | #6.5K | #1.5K | udn.com |
| Category Rank | #2 | #3 | cnyes.com |
cnyes.com only
udn.com only
Market Position · Insight
Each has untapped markets the other serves: cnyes.com could expand into Singapore, while udn.com could target Argentina.
Key Takeaways
- •cnyes.com is losing traffic (-6%) despite 11.9M monthly visits. udn.com's +6% growth puts it on a trajectory to overtake.
- •cnyes.com acquires users primarily through Direct (55%), while udn.com relies on Direct (44%). This reflects fundamentally different go-to-market strategies — cnyes.com's higher direct traffic suggests stronger brand recognition or product-led growth, while udn.com's search reliance means growth is more scalable but more vulnerable to algorithm changes.
- •udn.com receives 3.6x more monthly traffic than cnyes.com (42.5M vs 11.9M).
- •udn.com is growing (+6%) while cnyes.com is declining (-6%).
- •udn.com keeps visitors significantly longer (3m07s avg session vs cnyes.com's 1m58s), suggesting deeper product engagement or stickier content.
- •With only 7% keyword overlap, they target largely different search audiences.
You've seen the gap. Now steal the playbook.
A Growth Teardown reverse-engineers exactly how each product grows — traffic sources, backlink strategy, keyword gaps, and scored action items you can copy this week.
Related Comparisons
Report based on data from July 2026