codacy.com vs cubic.dev
Market traction comparison · Updated Jul 2026
| codacy.com | cubic.dev | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Monthly Visits | 139.4K | 61.8K | codacy.com |
| Bounce Rate | 35.8% | 38.5% | codacy.com |
| SEO & Keywords | 30 | 40 | cubic.dev |
| Domain Age | 14y 3m | 1y 4m | codacy.com |
codacy.com leads in 3 of 4 dimensions, while cubic.dev leads in 1.
Growth Momentum
| codacy.com | cubic.dev | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Monthly Visits | 139.4K | 61.8K | codacy.com |
| MoM Change | +14% | -13% | codacy.com |
| Avg. Session | 1m27s | 0m36s | codacy.com |
| Pages / Visit | 3.3 | 3.1 | codacy.com |
Growth Momentum · Insight
cubic.dev is losing traffic (-13%) despite 61.8K monthly visits. codacy.com's +14% growth puts it on a trajectory to overtake.
Acquisition Strategy
| codacy.com | cubic.dev | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary Channel | Direct 52% | Direct 54% | |
| Bounce Rate | 35.8% | 38.5% | codacy.com |
| SEO & Keywords | 30 | 40 | cubic.dev |
Keyword Overlap Rate: 30%
Acquisition Strategy · Insight
codacy.com acquires users primarily through Direct (52%), while cubic.dev relies on Direct (54%). This reflects fundamentally different go-to-market strategies — cubic.dev's higher direct traffic suggests stronger brand recognition or product-led growth, while cubic.dev's search reliance means growth is more scalable but more vulnerable to algorithm changes.
Business Maturity
| codacy.com | cubic.dev | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Domain Age | 14y 3m | 1y 4m | codacy.com |
| Registered | May 2012 | May 2025 | |
| Expires | May 2026 | May 2026 |
Business Maturity · Insight
codacy.com has been in the market for over a decade, indicating established presence.
Market Position
| codacy.com | cubic.dev | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Global Rank | #257.2K | #496.0K | codacy.com |
| Category Rank | #3.4K | #5.9K | codacy.com |
| PH Upvotes | — | 739 |
codacy.com only
cubic.dev only
Market Position · Insight
Each has untapped markets the other serves: codacy.com could expand into Vietnam, United Kingdom, while cubic.dev could target Pakistan, Brazil.
Key Takeaways
- •cubic.dev is losing traffic (-13%) despite 61.8K monthly visits. codacy.com's +14% growth puts it on a trajectory to overtake.
- •codacy.com acquires users primarily through Direct (52%), while cubic.dev relies on Direct (54%). This reflects fundamentally different go-to-market strategies — cubic.dev's higher direct traffic suggests stronger brand recognition or product-led growth, while cubic.dev's search reliance means growth is more scalable but more vulnerable to algorithm changes.
- •codacy.com receives 2.3x more monthly traffic than cubic.dev (139.4K vs 61.8K).
- •codacy.com is growing (+14%) while cubic.dev is declining (-13%).
- •codacy.com keeps visitors significantly longer (1m27s avg session vs cubic.dev's 0m36s), suggesting deeper product engagement or stickier content.
- •They share 16 keywords (30% overlap), indicating direct search competition.
You've seen the gap. Now steal the playbook.
A Growth Teardown reverse-engineers exactly how each product grows — traffic sources, backlink strategy, keyword gaps, and scored action items you can copy this week.
Related Comparisons
Report based on data from July 2026