codegpt.co vs lm-studio.me
Market traction comparison · Updated Jul 2026
| codegpt.co | lm-studio.me | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Monthly Visits | 186.8K | 7.4K | codegpt.co |
| Bounce Rate | 43.2% | 50.4% | codegpt.co |
| SEO & Keywords | 35 | 33 | codegpt.co |
| Domain Age | 3y 7m | 2y 1m | codegpt.co |
codegpt.co leads in 4 of 4 dimensions, while lm-studio.me leads in 0.
Growth Momentum
| codegpt.co | lm-studio.me | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Monthly Visits | 186.8K | 7.4K | codegpt.co |
| MoM Change | -13% | +284% | lm-studio.me |
| Avg. Session | 0m38s | 0m55s | lm-studio.me |
| Pages / Visit | 1.9 | 1.6 | codegpt.co |
Growth Momentum · Insight
codegpt.co is losing traffic (-13%) despite 186.8K monthly visits. lm-studio.me's +284% growth puts it on a trajectory to overtake.
Acquisition Strategy
| codegpt.co | lm-studio.me | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary Channel | Direct 41% | Search 98% | |
| Bounce Rate | 43.2% | 50.4% | codegpt.co |
| SEO & Keywords | 35 | 33 | codegpt.co |
Keyword Overlap Rate: 172%
Acquisition Strategy · Insight
codegpt.co acquires users primarily through Direct (41%), while lm-studio.me relies on Search (98%). This reflects fundamentally different go-to-market strategies — codegpt.co's higher direct traffic suggests stronger brand recognition or product-led growth, while lm-studio.me's search reliance means growth is more scalable but more vulnerable to algorithm changes.
Business Maturity
| codegpt.co | lm-studio.me | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Domain Age | 3y 7m | 2y 1m | codegpt.co |
| Registered | Jan 2023 | Jul 2024 | |
| Expires | Jan 2027 | Jul 2027 |
Business Maturity · Insight
codegpt.co has been in the market 2 years longer (4y vs 2y). codegpt.co's longer track record suggests established operations, while lm-studio.me's entry timing indicates the market still attracts new players.
Market Position
| codegpt.co | lm-studio.me | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Global Rank | #252.0K | #2.9M | codegpt.co |
| Category Rank | #3.8K | — |
Market Position · Insight
lm-studio.me is heavily concentrated in China (99%), creating dependency risk on a single market. codegpt.co has a more diversified audience.
Each has untapped markets the other serves: codegpt.co could expand into China, Japan, while lm-studio.me could target India, Mexico, United States.
Key Takeaways
- •codegpt.co is losing traffic (-13%) despite 186.8K monthly visits. lm-studio.me's +284% growth puts it on a trajectory to overtake.
- •codegpt.co acquires users primarily through Direct (41%), while lm-studio.me relies on Search (98%). This reflects fundamentally different go-to-market strategies — codegpt.co's higher direct traffic suggests stronger brand recognition or product-led growth, while lm-studio.me's search reliance means growth is more scalable but more vulnerable to algorithm changes.
- •codegpt.co receives 25.2x more monthly traffic than lm-studio.me (186.8K vs 7.4K).
- •lm-studio.me is growing (+284%) while codegpt.co is declining (-13%).
- •codegpt.co acquires traffic primarily through Direct (41%), while lm-studio.me relies on Search (98%) — fundamentally different acquisition strategies.
- •They share 43 keywords (172% overlap), indicating direct search competition.
You've seen the gap. Now steal the playbook.
A Growth Teardown reverse-engineers exactly how each product grows — traffic sources, backlink strategy, keyword gaps, and scored action items you can copy this week.
Related Comparisons
Report based on data from July 2026