coderabbit.ai vs devin.ai
Market traction comparison · Updated Jul 2026
| coderabbit.ai | devin.ai | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Monthly Visits | 1.3M | 2.7M | devin.ai |
| Bounce Rate | 48.5% | 34.5% | devin.ai |
| SEO & Keywords | 35 | 35 | Tie |
| Domain Age | 3y 4m | 3y 9m | devin.ai |
devin.ai leads in 3 of 4 dimensions, while coderabbit.ai leads in 0.
Growth Momentum
| coderabbit.ai | devin.ai | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Monthly Visits | 1.3M | 2.7M | devin.ai |
| MoM Change | +18% | -6% | coderabbit.ai |
| Avg. Session | 1m55s | 5m07s | devin.ai |
| Pages / Visit | 3.5 | 7.3 | devin.ai |
Growth Momentum · Insight
coderabbit.ai is growing faster (+18%) but visitors stay 2.7x shorter (1m55s vs 5m07s). Rapid growth with declining engagement depth often signals lower-quality traffic or shallow product usage.
Acquisition Strategy
| coderabbit.ai | devin.ai | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary Channel | Search 45% | Direct 52% | |
| Bounce Rate | 48.5% | 34.5% | devin.ai |
| SEO & Keywords | 35 | 35 | — |
Keyword Overlap Rate: 30%
Acquisition Strategy · Insight
coderabbit.ai acquires users primarily through Search (45%), while devin.ai relies on Direct (52%). This reflects fundamentally different go-to-market strategies — devin.ai's higher direct traffic suggests stronger brand recognition or product-led growth, while coderabbit.ai's search reliance means growth is more scalable but more vulnerable to algorithm changes.
Business Maturity
| coderabbit.ai | devin.ai | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Domain Age | 3y 4m | 3y 9m | devin.ai |
| Registered | Apr 2023 | Dec 2022 | |
| Expires | Apr 2027 | Dec 2028 |
Business Maturity · Insight
devin.ai has been in the market 0 years longer (4y vs 3y). devin.ai's longer track record suggests established operations, while coderabbit.ai's entry timing indicates the market still attracts new players.
Market Position
| coderabbit.ai | devin.ai | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Global Rank | #38.1K | #15.1K | devin.ai |
| Category Rank | #760 | #137 | devin.ai |
| PH Upvotes | 359 | 155 | coderabbit.ai |
coderabbit.ai only
devin.ai only
Market Position · Insight
Each has untapped markets the other serves: coderabbit.ai could expand into United Kingdom, Japan, while devin.ai could target Germany, Vietnam.
Key Takeaways
- •devin.ai is losing traffic (-6%) despite 2.7M monthly visits. coderabbit.ai's +18% growth puts it on a trajectory to overtake.
- •coderabbit.ai is growing faster (+18%) but visitors stay 2.7x shorter (1m55s vs 5m07s). Rapid growth with declining engagement depth often signals lower-quality traffic or shallow product usage.
- •coderabbit.ai acquires users primarily through Search (45%), while devin.ai relies on Direct (52%). This reflects fundamentally different go-to-market strategies — devin.ai's higher direct traffic suggests stronger brand recognition or product-led growth, while coderabbit.ai's search reliance means growth is more scalable but more vulnerable to algorithm changes.
- •devin.ai receives 2.1x more monthly traffic than coderabbit.ai (2.7M vs 1.3M).
- •coderabbit.ai is growing (+18%) while devin.ai is declining (-6%).
- •devin.ai keeps visitors significantly longer (5m07s avg session vs coderabbit.ai's 1m55s), suggesting deeper product engagement or stickier content.
You've seen the gap. Now steal the playbook.
A Growth Teardown reverse-engineers exactly how each product grows — traffic sources, backlink strategy, keyword gaps, and scored action items you can copy this week.
Related Comparisons
Report based on data from July 2026