coingecko.com vs mexc.com
Market traction comparison · Updated Jul 2026
| coingecko.com | mexc.com | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Monthly Visits | 11.0M | 19.4M | mexc.com |
| Bounce Rate | 60.0% | 24.2% | mexc.com |
| SEO & Keywords | 30 | 30 | Tie |
| Domain Age | 12y 5m | 26y 6m | mexc.com |
mexc.com leads in 3 of 4 dimensions, while coingecko.com leads in 0.
Growth Momentum
| coingecko.com | mexc.com | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Monthly Visits | 11.0M | 19.4M | mexc.com |
| MoM Change | -9% | +8% | mexc.com |
| Avg. Session | 3m11s | 6m23s | mexc.com |
| Pages / Visit | 2.8 | 10.6 | mexc.com |
Growth Momentum · Insight
coingecko.com is losing traffic (-9%) despite 11.0M monthly visits. mexc.com's +8% growth puts it on a trajectory to overtake.
Acquisition Strategy
| coingecko.com | mexc.com | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary Channel | Direct 69% | Direct 84% | |
| Bounce Rate | 60.0% | 24.2% | mexc.com |
| SEO & Keywords | 30 | 30 | — |
Keyword Overlap Rate: 15%
Acquisition Strategy · Insight
coingecko.com acquires users primarily through Direct (69%), while mexc.com relies on Direct (84%). This reflects fundamentally different go-to-market strategies — mexc.com's higher direct traffic suggests stronger brand recognition or product-led growth, while coingecko.com's search reliance means growth is more scalable but more vulnerable to algorithm changes.
Business Maturity
| coingecko.com | mexc.com | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Domain Age | 12y 5m | 26y 6m | mexc.com |
| Registered | Mar 2014 | Feb 2000 | |
| Expires | Mar 2027 | Feb 2030 |
Business Maturity · Insight
mexc.com has been in the market for over a decade, indicating established presence.
Market Position
| coingecko.com | mexc.com | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Global Rank | #6.7K | #1.4K | mexc.com |
| Category Rank | #8 | #1 | mexc.com |
| PH Upvotes | — | 0 |
coingecko.com only
mexc.com only
Market Position · Insight
Each has untapped markets the other serves: coingecko.com could expand into Singapore, India, Philippines, while mexc.com could target Germany, Poland, United Kingdom.
Key Takeaways
- •coingecko.com is losing traffic (-9%) despite 11.0M monthly visits. mexc.com's +8% growth puts it on a trajectory to overtake.
- •coingecko.com acquires users primarily through Direct (69%), while mexc.com relies on Direct (84%). This reflects fundamentally different go-to-market strategies — mexc.com's higher direct traffic suggests stronger brand recognition or product-led growth, while coingecko.com's search reliance means growth is more scalable but more vulnerable to algorithm changes.
- •mexc.com has 1.8x more traffic (19.4M vs 11.0M), though both operate at comparable scale.
- •mexc.com is growing (+8%) while coingecko.com is declining (-9%).
- •mexc.com keeps visitors significantly longer (6m23s avg session vs coingecko.com's 3m11s), suggesting deeper product engagement or stickier content.
- •mexc.com has a 36 percentage point lower bounce rate (24% vs 60%), indicating better landing page relevance or more targeted traffic.
You've seen the gap. Now steal the playbook.
A Growth Teardown reverse-engineers exactly how each product grows — traffic sources, backlink strategy, keyword gaps, and scored action items you can copy this week.
Related Comparisons
Report based on data from July 2026