coproxy.io vs proxysite.com

Market traction comparison · Updated Jul 2026

coproxy.io faviconcoproxy.io
VS
proxysite.com faviconproxysite.com
 coproxy.ioproxysite.comLeads
Monthly Visits1.5M12.4Mproxysite.com
Bounce Rate28.8%12.8%proxysite.com
SEO & Keywords3030Tie
Domain Age4y 9m25y 8mproxysite.com

proxysite.com leads in 3 of 4 dimensions, while coproxy.io leads in 0.

Growth Momentum

Growth Momentum
coproxy.ioproxysite.com
 coproxy.ioproxysite.comLeads
Monthly Visits1.5M12.4Mproxysite.com
MoM Change-2%+4%proxysite.com
Avg. Session1m47s8m19sproxysite.com
Pages / Visit3.522.6proxysite.com

Growth Momentum · Insight

coproxy.io is losing traffic (-2%) despite 1.5M monthly visits. proxysite.com's +4% growth puts it on a trajectory to overtake.

Acquisition Strategy

 coproxy.ioproxysite.comLeads
Primary ChannelSearch 64%Search 61%
Bounce Rate28.8%12.8%proxysite.com
SEO & Keywords3030
coproxy.io
Search 64%Direct 33%Referral 2%
proxysite.com
Search 61%Direct 36%Social 1%Referral 1%
SearchDirectSocialReferralPaidEmail
-39
69
-39
coproxy.io OnlySharedproxysite.com Only

Keyword Overlap Rate: 0%

KeywordVolumecoproxy.ioproxysite.com
proxy site76.4K#8#1
free proxy52.6K#7#4
online proxy35.5K#6#3
proxy website16.4K#8#3

Acquisition Strategy · Insight

coproxy.io acquires users primarily through Search (64%), while proxysite.com relies on Search (61%). This reflects fundamentally different go-to-market strategies — proxysite.com's higher direct traffic suggests stronger brand recognition or product-led growth, while coproxy.io's search reliance means growth is more scalable but more vulnerable to algorithm changes.

Business Maturity

 coproxy.ioproxysite.comLeads
Domain Age4y 9m25y 8mproxysite.com
RegisteredNov 2021Jan 2001
ExpiresNov 2026Jan 2029

Business Maturity · Insight

proxysite.com has been in the market for over a decade, indicating established presence.

Market Position

 coproxy.ioproxysite.comLeads
Global Rank#35.6K#1.7Kproxysite.com
Category Rank#77#2proxysite.com
coproxy.ioproxysite.com
🇺🇸 United States
33%
8%
🇮🇩 Indonesia
7%
13%

coproxy.io only

🌐 Oman 10%🇷🇺 Russia 4%🇬🇧 United Kingdom 4%

proxysite.com only

🇮🇳 India 20%🇰🇷 South Korea 14%🇹🇷 Türkiye 4%

Market Position · Insight

Each has untapped markets the other serves: coproxy.io could expand into India, South Korea, Türkiye, while proxysite.com could target Oman, Russia, United Kingdom.

Key Takeaways

  • coproxy.io is losing traffic (-2%) despite 1.5M monthly visits. proxysite.com's +4% growth puts it on a trajectory to overtake.
  • coproxy.io acquires users primarily through Search (64%), while proxysite.com relies on Search (61%). This reflects fundamentally different go-to-market strategies — proxysite.com's higher direct traffic suggests stronger brand recognition or product-led growth, while coproxy.io's search reliance means growth is more scalable but more vulnerable to algorithm changes.
  • proxysite.com receives 8.4x more monthly traffic than coproxy.io (12.4M vs 1.5M).
  • proxysite.com is growing (+4%) while coproxy.io is declining (-2%).
  • proxysite.com keeps visitors significantly longer (8m19s avg session vs coproxy.io's 1m47s), suggesting deeper product engagement or stickier content.
  • proxysite.com has a 16 percentage point lower bounce rate (13% vs 29%), indicating better landing page relevance or more targeted traffic.

You've seen the gap. Now steal the playbook.

A Growth Teardown reverse-engineers exactly how each product grows — traffic sources, backlink strategy, keyword gaps, and scored action items you can copy this week.

Related Comparisons

Report based on data from July 2026