crewai.com vs exa.ai
Market traction comparison · Updated Jul 2026
| crewai.com | exa.ai | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Monthly Visits | 476.6K | 846.8K | exa.ai |
| Bounce Rate | 46.2% | 37.5% | exa.ai |
| Domain Age | 9y 1m | 8y 8m | crewai.com |
exa.ai leads in 2 of 3 dimensions, while crewai.com leads in 1.
Growth Momentum
| crewai.com | exa.ai | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Monthly Visits | 476.6K | 846.8K | exa.ai |
| MoM Change | -10% | +12% | exa.ai |
| Avg. Session | 1m33s | 3m23s | exa.ai |
| Pages / Visit | 2.6 | 4.3 | exa.ai |
Growth Momentum · Insight
crewai.com is losing traffic (-10%) despite 476.6K monthly visits. exa.ai's +12% growth puts it on a trajectory to overtake.
Acquisition Strategy
| crewai.com | exa.ai | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary Channel | Search 56% | Direct 52% | |
| Bounce Rate | 46.2% | 37.5% | exa.ai |
Acquisition Strategy · Insight
crewai.com acquires users primarily through Search (56%), while exa.ai relies on Direct (52%). This reflects fundamentally different go-to-market strategies — exa.ai's higher direct traffic suggests stronger brand recognition or product-led growth, while crewai.com's search reliance means growth is more scalable but more vulnerable to algorithm changes.
Business Maturity
| crewai.com | exa.ai | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Domain Age | 9y 1m | 8y 8m | crewai.com |
| Registered | Jul 2017 | Dec 2017 | |
| Expires | Jul 2026 | Jan 2034 |
Business Maturity · Insight
crewai.com has been in the market 0 years longer (9y vs 9y). crewai.com's longer track record suggests established operations, while exa.ai's entry timing indicates the market still attracts new players.
Market Position
| crewai.com | exa.ai | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Global Rank | #107.5K | #55.4K | exa.ai |
| Category Rank | #213 | #637 | crewai.com |
| PH Upvotes | 25 | 167 | exa.ai |
crewai.com only
exa.ai only
Market Position · Insight
exa.ai is heavily concentrated in United States (47%), creating dependency risk on a single market. crewai.com has a more diversified audience.
Each has untapped markets the other serves: crewai.com could expand into Germany, while exa.ai could target Brazil.
Key Takeaways
- •crewai.com is losing traffic (-10%) despite 476.6K monthly visits. exa.ai's +12% growth puts it on a trajectory to overtake.
- •crewai.com acquires users primarily through Search (56%), while exa.ai relies on Direct (52%). This reflects fundamentally different go-to-market strategies — exa.ai's higher direct traffic suggests stronger brand recognition or product-led growth, while crewai.com's search reliance means growth is more scalable but more vulnerable to algorithm changes.
- •exa.ai has 1.8x more traffic (846.8K vs 476.6K), though both operate at comparable scale.
- •exa.ai is growing (+12%) while crewai.com is declining (-10%).
- •exa.ai keeps visitors significantly longer (3m23s avg session vs crewai.com's 1m33s), suggesting deeper product engagement or stickier content.
- •exa.ai has a 9 percentage point lower bounce rate (38% vs 46%), indicating better landing page relevance or more targeted traffic.
You've seen the gap. Now steal the playbook.
A Growth Teardown reverse-engineers exactly how each product grows — traffic sources, backlink strategy, keyword gaps, and scored action items you can copy this week.
Related Comparisons
Report based on data from July 2026