cyclingweekly.com vs procyclingstats.com
Market traction comparison · Updated Jul 2026
| cyclingweekly.com | procyclingstats.com | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Monthly Visits | 3.0M | 24.5M | procyclingstats.com |
| Bounce Rate | 54.9% | 22.7% | procyclingstats.com |
| SEO & Keywords | 30 | 30 | Tie |
| Domain Age | 28y 2m | 14y 5m | cyclingweekly.com |
procyclingstats.com leads in 2 of 4 dimensions, while cyclingweekly.com leads in 1.
Growth Momentum
| cyclingweekly.com | procyclingstats.com | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Monthly Visits | 3.0M | 24.5M | procyclingstats.com |
| MoM Change | +9% | +36% | procyclingstats.com |
| Avg. Session | 1m18s | 7m56s | procyclingstats.com |
| Pages / Visit | 1.8 | 8.2 | procyclingstats.com |
Growth Momentum · Insight
procyclingstats.com is growing +36% while cyclingweekly.com grows +9%. At current trajectory, procyclingstats.com could close the traffic gap within 3 months.
Acquisition Strategy
| cyclingweekly.com | procyclingstats.com | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary Channel | Search 60% | Direct 74% | |
| Bounce Rate | 54.9% | 22.7% | procyclingstats.com |
| SEO & Keywords | 30 | 30 | — |
Keyword Overlap Rate: 5%
Acquisition Strategy · Insight
cyclingweekly.com acquires users primarily through Search (60%), while procyclingstats.com relies on Direct (74%). This reflects fundamentally different go-to-market strategies — procyclingstats.com's higher direct traffic suggests stronger brand recognition or product-led growth, while cyclingweekly.com's search reliance means growth is more scalable but more vulnerable to algorithm changes.
Business Maturity
| cyclingweekly.com | procyclingstats.com | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Domain Age | 28y 2m | 14y 5m | cyclingweekly.com |
| Registered | Jun 1998 | Mar 2012 | |
| Expires | Jun 2026 | Mar 2027 |
Business Maturity · Insight
cyclingweekly.com has been in the market for over a decade, indicating established presence.
Market Position
| cyclingweekly.com | procyclingstats.com | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Global Rank | #25.1K | #1.8K | procyclingstats.com |
| Category Rank | #7 | #2 | procyclingstats.com |
cyclingweekly.com only
procyclingstats.com only
Market Position · Insight
Each has untapped markets the other serves: cyclingweekly.com could expand into Belgium, Netherlands, France, while procyclingstats.com could target United Kingdom, Canada, Poland.
Key Takeaways
- •procyclingstats.com is growing +36% while cyclingweekly.com grows +9%. At current trajectory, procyclingstats.com could close the traffic gap within 3 months.
- •cyclingweekly.com acquires users primarily through Search (60%), while procyclingstats.com relies on Direct (74%). This reflects fundamentally different go-to-market strategies — procyclingstats.com's higher direct traffic suggests stronger brand recognition or product-led growth, while cyclingweekly.com's search reliance means growth is more scalable but more vulnerable to algorithm changes.
- •procyclingstats.com receives 8.2x more monthly traffic than cyclingweekly.com (24.5M vs 3.0M).
- •Both are growing, with procyclingstats.com accelerating faster at +36% vs +9%.
- •procyclingstats.com keeps visitors significantly longer (7m56s avg session vs cyclingweekly.com's 1m18s), suggesting deeper product engagement or stickier content.
- •procyclingstats.com has a 32 percentage point lower bounce rate (23% vs 55%), indicating better landing page relevance or more targeted traffic.
You've seen the gap. Now steal the playbook.
A Growth Teardown reverse-engineers exactly how each product grows — traffic sources, backlink strategy, keyword gaps, and scored action items you can copy this week.
Related Comparisons
Report based on data from July 2026