d.foundation vs mermaid.live

Market traction comparison · Updated Jul 2026

d.foundation favicond.foundation
VS
mermaid.live faviconmermaid.live
 d.foundationmermaid.liveLeads
Monthly Visits7.9K2.0Mmermaid.live
Bounce Rate39.9%15.4%mermaid.live
SEO & Keywords3030Tie
Domain Age7y 10m5yd.foundation

mermaid.live leads in 2 of 4 dimensions, while d.foundation leads in 1.

Growth Momentum

Growth Momentum
d.foundationmermaid.live
 d.foundationmermaid.liveLeads
Monthly Visits7.9K2.0Mmermaid.live
MoM Change-58%-17%mermaid.live
Avg. Session0m30s5m35smermaid.live
Pages / Visit2.320.8mermaid.live

Growth Momentum · Insight

mermaid.live receives 250.1x more monthly traffic than d.foundation (2.0M vs 7.9K).

Acquisition Strategy

 d.foundationmermaid.liveLeads
Primary ChannelDirect 95%Direct 41%
Bounce Rate39.9%15.4%mermaid.live
SEO & Keywords3030
d.foundation
Search 5%Direct 95%
mermaid.live
Search 36%Direct 41%Social 4%Referral 17%Email 1%
SearchDirectSocialReferralPaidEmail
-48
78
-48
d.foundation OnlySharedmermaid.live Only

Keyword Overlap Rate: 0%

KeywordVolumed.foundationmermaid.live
mermaid live editor114.3K#6#1

Acquisition Strategy · Insight

d.foundation acquires users primarily through Direct (95%), while mermaid.live relies on Direct (41%). This reflects fundamentally different go-to-market strategies — d.foundation's higher direct traffic suggests stronger brand recognition or product-led growth, while mermaid.live's search reliance means growth is more scalable but more vulnerable to algorithm changes.

Business Maturity

 d.foundationmermaid.liveLeads
Domain Age7y 10m5yd.foundation
RegisteredNov 2018Aug 2021
ExpiresNov 2026Aug 2026

Business Maturity · Insight

d.foundation has been in the market 3 years longer (8y vs 5y). d.foundation's longer track record suggests established operations, while mermaid.live's entry timing indicates the market still attracts new players.

Market Position

 d.foundationmermaid.liveLeads
Global Rank#2.5M#12.3Kmermaid.live
Category Rank#26.1K
d.foundationmermaid.live
🇺🇸 United States
22%
10%
🇷🇺 Russia
18%
4%

d.foundation only

🌐 Vietnam 31%🇧🇷 Brazil 14%🇳🇱 Netherlands 7%

mermaid.live only

🌐 China 17%🇮🇳 India 12%🇮🇩 Indonesia 6%

Market Position · Insight

Each has untapped markets the other serves: d.foundation could expand into China, India, Indonesia, while mermaid.live could target Vietnam, Brazil, Netherlands.

Key Takeaways

  • mermaid.live receives 250.1x more monthly traffic than d.foundation (2.0M vs 7.9K).
  • d.foundation acquires users primarily through Direct (95%), while mermaid.live relies on Direct (41%). This reflects fundamentally different go-to-market strategies — d.foundation's higher direct traffic suggests stronger brand recognition or product-led growth, while mermaid.live's search reliance means growth is more scalable but more vulnerable to algorithm changes.
  • mermaid.live receives 250.1x more monthly traffic than d.foundation (2.0M vs 7.9K).
  • mermaid.live keeps visitors significantly longer (5m35s avg session vs d.foundation's 0m30s), suggesting deeper product engagement or stickier content.
  • mermaid.live has a 24 percentage point lower bounce rate (15% vs 40%), indicating better landing page relevance or more targeted traffic.
  • With only 0% keyword overlap, they target largely different search audiences.

You've seen the gap. Now steal the playbook.

A Growth Teardown reverse-engineers exactly how each product grows — traffic sources, backlink strategy, keyword gaps, and scored action items you can copy this week.

Related Comparisons

Report based on data from July 2026