dict.cc vs leo.org
Market traction comparison · Updated Jul 2026
| dict.cc | leo.org | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Monthly Visits | 5.7M | 6.9M | leo.org |
| Bounce Rate | 36.0% | 37.3% | dict.cc |
| SEO & Keywords | 30 | 30 | Tie |
| Domain Age | 24y 3m | — |
dict.cc leads in 1 of 3 dimensions, while leo.org leads in 1.
Growth Momentum
| dict.cc | leo.org | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Monthly Visits | 5.7M | 6.9M | leo.org |
| MoM Change | +0% | +0% | — |
| Avg. Session | 5m06s | 6m06s | leo.org |
| Pages / Visit | 3.2 | 3.9 | leo.org |
Growth Momentum · Insight
leo.org receives 1.2x more monthly traffic than dict.cc (6.9M vs 5.7M).
Acquisition Strategy
| dict.cc | leo.org | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary Channel | Direct 71% | Direct 70% | |
| Bounce Rate | 36.0% | 37.3% | dict.cc |
| SEO & Keywords | 30 | 30 | — |
Keyword Overlap Rate: 233%
| Keyword | Volume | dict.cc | leo.org |
|---|---|---|---|
| übersetzer | 2.5M | #10 | #5 |
| emeritiert | 1.5K | #10 | #3 |
Acquisition Strategy · Insight
dict.cc acquires users primarily through Direct (71%), while leo.org relies on Direct (70%). This reflects fundamentally different go-to-market strategies — dict.cc's higher direct traffic suggests stronger brand recognition or product-led growth, while dict.cc's search reliance means growth is more scalable but more vulnerable to algorithm changes.
Business Maturity
| dict.cc | leo.org | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Domain Age | 24y 3m | — | |
| Registered | Jun 2002 | — | |
| Expires | Jun 2033 | — |
Market Position
| dict.cc | leo.org | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Global Rank | #11.8K | #8.7K | leo.org |
| Category Rank | #6 | #5 | leo.org |
dict.cc only
leo.org only
Market Position · Insight
Each has untapped markets the other serves: dict.cc could expand into Brazil, while leo.org could target United Kingdom.
Key Takeaways
- •leo.org receives 1.2x more monthly traffic than dict.cc (6.9M vs 5.7M).
- •dict.cc acquires users primarily through Direct (71%), while leo.org relies on Direct (70%). This reflects fundamentally different go-to-market strategies — dict.cc's higher direct traffic suggests stronger brand recognition or product-led growth, while dict.cc's search reliance means growth is more scalable but more vulnerable to algorithm changes.
- •leo.org has 1.2x more traffic (6.9M vs 5.7M), though both operate at comparable scale.
- •They share 42 keywords (233% overlap), indicating direct search competition.
You've seen the gap. Now steal the playbook.
A Growth Teardown reverse-engineers exactly how each product grows — traffic sources, backlink strategy, keyword gaps, and scored action items you can copy this week.
Related Comparisons
Report based on data from July 2026