duda.co vs emergent.sh
Market traction comparison · Updated Jul 2026
| duda.co | emergent.sh | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Monthly Visits | 482.1K | 9.2M | emergent.sh |
| Bounce Rate | 36.5% | 34.3% | emergent.sh |
| SEO & Keywords | 35 | 35 | Tie |
| Domain Age | 16y 1m | 2y 2m | duda.co |
emergent.sh leads in 2 of 4 dimensions, while duda.co leads in 1.
Growth Momentum
| duda.co | emergent.sh | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Monthly Visits | 482.1K | 9.2M | emergent.sh |
| MoM Change | +9% | +24% | emergent.sh |
| Avg. Session | 7m36s | 5m00s | duda.co |
| Pages / Visit | 5.6 | 4.8 | duda.co |
Growth Momentum · Insight
emergent.sh is growing faster (+24%) but visitors stay 1.5x shorter (5m00s vs 7m36s). Rapid growth with declining engagement depth often signals lower-quality traffic or shallow product usage.
Acquisition Strategy
| duda.co | emergent.sh | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary Channel | Direct 65% | Search 47% | |
| Bounce Rate | 36.5% | 34.3% | emergent.sh |
| SEO & Keywords | 35 | 35 | — |
Keyword Overlap Rate: 13%
Acquisition Strategy · Insight
duda.co acquires users primarily through Direct (65%), while emergent.sh relies on Search (47%). This reflects fundamentally different go-to-market strategies — duda.co's higher direct traffic suggests stronger brand recognition or product-led growth, while emergent.sh's search reliance means growth is more scalable but more vulnerable to algorithm changes.
Business Maturity
| duda.co | emergent.sh | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Domain Age | 16y 1m | 2y 2m | duda.co |
| Registered | Jul 2010 | Jun 2024 | |
| Expires | Jul 2026 | Jun 2027 |
Business Maturity · Insight
duda.co has been in the market for over a decade, indicating established presence.
Market Position
| duda.co | emergent.sh | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Global Rank | #83.6K | #5.7K | emergent.sh |
| Category Rank | #230 | #46 | emergent.sh |
| PH Upvotes | — | 582 |
duda.co only
emergent.sh only
Market Position · Insight
Each has untapped markets the other serves: duda.co could expand into India, United Kingdom, Indonesia, while emergent.sh could target Canada, Brazil, Germany.
Key Takeaways
- •emergent.sh is growing +24% while duda.co grows +9%. At current trajectory, emergent.sh could close the traffic gap within 4 months.
- •emergent.sh is growing faster (+24%) but visitors stay 1.5x shorter (5m00s vs 7m36s). Rapid growth with declining engagement depth often signals lower-quality traffic or shallow product usage.
- •duda.co acquires users primarily through Direct (65%), while emergent.sh relies on Search (47%). This reflects fundamentally different go-to-market strategies — duda.co's higher direct traffic suggests stronger brand recognition or product-led growth, while emergent.sh's search reliance means growth is more scalable but more vulnerable to algorithm changes.
- •emergent.sh receives 19.1x more monthly traffic than duda.co (9.2M vs 482.1K).
- •Both are growing, with emergent.sh accelerating faster at +24% vs +9%.
- •duda.co keeps visitors significantly longer (7m36s avg session vs emergent.sh's 5m00s), suggesting deeper product engagement or stickier content.
You've seen the gap. Now steal the playbook.
A Growth Teardown reverse-engineers exactly how each product grows — traffic sources, backlink strategy, keyword gaps, and scored action items you can copy this week.
Related Comparisons
Report based on data from July 2026