eklipse.gg vs fileshot.io
Market traction comparison · Updated Jul 2026
| eklipse.gg | fileshot.io | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Monthly Visits | 310.5K | 2.4M | fileshot.io |
| Bounce Rate | 38.6% | 60.3% | eklipse.gg |
| SEO & Keywords | 35 | 20 | eklipse.gg |
| Domain Age | 6y 1m | 9m | eklipse.gg |
eklipse.gg leads in 3 of 4 dimensions, while fileshot.io leads in 1.
Growth Momentum
| eklipse.gg | fileshot.io | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Monthly Visits | 310.5K | 2.4M | fileshot.io |
| MoM Change | +18% | +1314% | fileshot.io |
| Avg. Session | 3m58s | 1m07s | eklipse.gg |
| Pages / Visit | 4.5 | 2.4 | eklipse.gg |
Growth Momentum · Insight
fileshot.io is growing faster (+1314%) but visitors stay 3.5x shorter (1m07s vs 3m58s). Rapid growth with declining engagement depth often signals lower-quality traffic or shallow product usage.
Acquisition Strategy
| eklipse.gg | fileshot.io | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary Channel | Search 45% | Search 85% | |
| Bounce Rate | 38.6% | 60.3% | eklipse.gg |
| SEO & Keywords | 35 | 20 | eklipse.gg |
Keyword Overlap Rate: 10%
Acquisition Strategy · Insight
eklipse.gg acquires users primarily through Search (45%), while fileshot.io relies on Search (85%). This reflects fundamentally different go-to-market strategies — eklipse.gg's higher direct traffic suggests stronger brand recognition or product-led growth, while fileshot.io's search reliance means growth is more scalable but more vulnerable to algorithm changes.
Business Maturity
| eklipse.gg | fileshot.io | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Domain Age | 6y 1m | 9m | eklipse.gg |
| Registered | Aug 2020 | Nov 2025 | |
| Expires | — | Nov 2026 |
Business Maturity · Insight
eklipse.gg has a 5-year head start, but fileshot.io's trajectory shows strong growth momentum.
Market Position
| eklipse.gg | fileshot.io | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Global Rank | #126.9K | #25.6K | fileshot.io |
| Category Rank | #2.0K | #179 | fileshot.io |
| PH Upvotes | 10 | 6 | eklipse.gg |
eklipse.gg only
fileshot.io only
Market Position · Insight
Each has untapped markets the other serves: eklipse.gg could expand into Canada, while fileshot.io could target Brazil.
Key Takeaways
- •fileshot.io receives 7.7x more monthly traffic than eklipse.gg (2.4M vs 310.5K).
- •fileshot.io is growing faster (+1314%) but visitors stay 3.5x shorter (1m07s vs 3m58s). Rapid growth with declining engagement depth often signals lower-quality traffic or shallow product usage.
- •eklipse.gg acquires users primarily through Search (45%), while fileshot.io relies on Search (85%). This reflects fundamentally different go-to-market strategies — eklipse.gg's higher direct traffic suggests stronger brand recognition or product-led growth, while fileshot.io's search reliance means growth is more scalable but more vulnerable to algorithm changes.
- •fileshot.io receives 7.7x more monthly traffic than eklipse.gg (2.4M vs 310.5K).
- •Both are growing, with fileshot.io accelerating faster at +1314% vs +18%.
- •eklipse.gg keeps visitors significantly longer (3m58s avg session vs fileshot.io's 1m07s), suggesting deeper product engagement or stickier content.
You've seen the gap. Now steal the playbook.
A Growth Teardown reverse-engineers exactly how each product grows — traffic sources, backlink strategy, keyword gaps, and scored action items you can copy this week.
Related Comparisons
Report based on data from July 2026