emailondeck.com vs temp-mail.io
Market traction comparison · Updated Jul 2026
| emailondeck.com | temp-mail.io | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Monthly Visits | 922.4K | 1.8M | temp-mail.io |
| Bounce Rate | 30.4% | 53.8% | emailondeck.com |
| SEO & Keywords | 30 | 30 | Tie |
| Domain Age | 11y 2m | 7y 9m | emailondeck.com |
emailondeck.com leads in 2 of 4 dimensions, while temp-mail.io leads in 1.
Growth Momentum
| emailondeck.com | temp-mail.io | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Monthly Visits | 922.4K | 1.8M | temp-mail.io |
| MoM Change | +2% | -6% | emailondeck.com |
| Avg. Session | 4m34s | 2m45s | emailondeck.com |
| Pages / Visit | 4.2 | 2.5 | emailondeck.com |
Growth Momentum · Insight
temp-mail.io is losing traffic (-6%) despite 1.8M monthly visits. emailondeck.com's +2% growth puts it on a trajectory to overtake.
Acquisition Strategy
| emailondeck.com | temp-mail.io | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary Channel | Search 44% | Search 57% | |
| Bounce Rate | 30.4% | 53.8% | emailondeck.com |
| SEO & Keywords | 30 | 30 | — |
Keyword Overlap Rate: 0%
Acquisition Strategy · Insight
emailondeck.com acquires users primarily through Search (44%), while temp-mail.io relies on Search (57%). This reflects fundamentally different go-to-market strategies — emailondeck.com's higher direct traffic suggests stronger brand recognition or product-led growth, while temp-mail.io's search reliance means growth is more scalable but more vulnerable to algorithm changes.
Business Maturity
| emailondeck.com | temp-mail.io | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Domain Age | 11y 2m | 7y 9m | emailondeck.com |
| Registered | Jun 2015 | Nov 2018 | |
| Expires | Jun 2028 | Nov 2026 |
Business Maturity · Insight
emailondeck.com has been in the market for over a decade, indicating established presence.
Market Position
| emailondeck.com | temp-mail.io | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Global Rank | #50.8K | #35.6K | temp-mail.io |
| Category Rank | #29 | #31 | emailondeck.com |
emailondeck.com only
temp-mail.io only
Market Position · Insight
Each has untapped markets the other serves: emailondeck.com could expand into Pakistan, France, Mexico, while temp-mail.io could target Colombia, Bangladesh, Germany.
Key Takeaways
- •temp-mail.io is losing traffic (-6%) despite 1.8M monthly visits. emailondeck.com's +2% growth puts it on a trajectory to overtake.
- •emailondeck.com acquires users primarily through Search (44%), while temp-mail.io relies on Search (57%). This reflects fundamentally different go-to-market strategies — emailondeck.com's higher direct traffic suggests stronger brand recognition or product-led growth, while temp-mail.io's search reliance means growth is more scalable but more vulnerable to algorithm changes.
- •temp-mail.io has 1.9x more traffic (1.8M vs 922.4K), though both operate at comparable scale.
- •emailondeck.com is growing (+2%) while temp-mail.io is declining (-6%).
- •emailondeck.com keeps visitors significantly longer (4m34s avg session vs temp-mail.io's 2m45s), suggesting deeper product engagement or stickier content.
- •emailondeck.com has a 23 percentage point lower bounce rate (30% vs 54%), indicating better landing page relevance or more targeted traffic.
You've seen the gap. Now steal the playbook.
A Growth Teardown reverse-engineers exactly how each product grows — traffic sources, backlink strategy, keyword gaps, and scored action items you can copy this week.
Related Comparisons
Report based on data from July 2026