emergent.sh vs macaly.com

Market traction comparison · Updated Jul 2026

emergent.sh faviconemergent.sh
VS
macaly.com faviconmacaly.com
 emergent.shmacaly.comLeads
Monthly Visits9.2M62.6Kemergent.sh
Bounce Rate34.3%39.0%emergent.sh
SEO & Keywords3534emergent.sh
Domain Age2y 2m4y 2mmacaly.com

emergent.sh leads in 3 of 4 dimensions, while macaly.com leads in 1.

Growth Momentum

Growth Momentum
emergent.shmacaly.com
 emergent.shmacaly.comLeads
Monthly Visits9.2M62.6Kemergent.sh
MoM Change+24%-18%emergent.sh
Avg. Session5m00s2m28semergent.sh
Pages / Visit4.83.8emergent.sh

Growth Momentum · Insight

macaly.com is losing traffic (-18%) despite 62.6K monthly visits. emergent.sh's +24% growth puts it on a trajectory to overtake.

Acquisition Strategy

 emergent.shmacaly.comLeads
Primary ChannelSearch 47%Direct 39%
Bounce Rate34.3%39.0%emergent.sh
SEO & Keywords3534emergent.sh
emergent.sh
Search 47%Direct 34%Social 8%Referral 8%Email 3%
macaly.com
Search 33%Direct 39%Social 4%Referral 17%Email 6%
SearchDirectSocialReferralPaidEmail
4
31
3
emergent.sh OnlySharedmacaly.com Only

Keyword Overlap Rate: 82%

Acquisition Strategy · Insight

emergent.sh acquires users primarily through Search (47%), while macaly.com relies on Direct (39%). This reflects fundamentally different go-to-market strategies — macaly.com's higher direct traffic suggests stronger brand recognition or product-led growth, while emergent.sh's search reliance means growth is more scalable but more vulnerable to algorithm changes.

Business Maturity

 emergent.shmacaly.comLeads
Domain Age2y 2m4y 2mmacaly.com
RegisteredJun 2024Jun 2022
ExpiresJun 2027Jun 2026

Business Maturity · Insight

macaly.com has been in the market 2 years longer (4y vs 2y). macaly.com's longer track record suggests established operations, while emergent.sh's entry timing indicates the market still attracts new players.

Market Position

 emergent.shmacaly.comLeads
Global Rank#5.7K#485.2Kemergent.sh
Category Rank#46#64emergent.sh
PH Upvotes582655macaly.com
emergent.shmacaly.com
🇮🇳 India
38%
3%
🇺🇸 United States
14%
15%

emergent.sh only

🇬🇧 United Kingdom 5%🇮🇩 Indonesia 4%🇮🇹 Italy 3%

macaly.com only

🌐 Czechia 67%🌐 Nigeria 3%🇹🇷 Türkiye 2%

Market Position · Insight

Each has untapped markets the other serves: emergent.sh could expand into Czechia, Nigeria, Türkiye, while macaly.com could target United Kingdom, Indonesia, Italy.

Key Takeaways

  • macaly.com is losing traffic (-18%) despite 62.6K monthly visits. emergent.sh's +24% growth puts it on a trajectory to overtake.
  • emergent.sh acquires users primarily through Search (47%), while macaly.com relies on Direct (39%). This reflects fundamentally different go-to-market strategies — macaly.com's higher direct traffic suggests stronger brand recognition or product-led growth, while emergent.sh's search reliance means growth is more scalable but more vulnerable to algorithm changes.
  • emergent.sh receives 147.0x more monthly traffic than macaly.com (9.2M vs 62.6K).
  • emergent.sh is growing (+24%) while macaly.com is declining (-18%).
  • emergent.sh keeps visitors significantly longer (5m00s avg session vs macaly.com's 2m28s), suggesting deeper product engagement or stickier content.
  • emergent.sh acquires traffic primarily through Search (47%), while macaly.com relies on Direct (39%) — fundamentally different acquisition strategies.

You've seen the gap. Now steal the playbook.

A Growth Teardown reverse-engineers exactly how each product grows — traffic sources, backlink strategy, keyword gaps, and scored action items you can copy this week.

Related Comparisons

Report based on data from July 2026