epidemicsound.com vs uppbeat.io
Market traction comparison · Updated Jul 2026
| epidemicsound.com | uppbeat.io | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Monthly Visits | 7.2M | 1.7M | epidemicsound.com |
| Bounce Rate | 41.7% | 45.9% | epidemicsound.com |
| SEO & Keywords | 35 | 30 | epidemicsound.com |
| Domain Age | 17y 3m | 6y | epidemicsound.com |
epidemicsound.com leads in 4 of 4 dimensions, while uppbeat.io leads in 0.
Growth Momentum
| epidemicsound.com | uppbeat.io | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Monthly Visits | 7.2M | 1.7M | epidemicsound.com |
| MoM Change | +5% | +6% | uppbeat.io |
| Avg. Session | 3m56s | 2m33s | epidemicsound.com |
| Pages / Visit | 5.3 | 3.5 | epidemicsound.com |
Growth Momentum · Insight
epidemicsound.com receives 4.3x more monthly traffic than uppbeat.io (7.2M vs 1.7M).
Acquisition Strategy
| epidemicsound.com | uppbeat.io | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary Channel | Direct 45% | Search 54% | |
| Bounce Rate | 41.7% | 45.9% | epidemicsound.com |
| SEO & Keywords | 35 | 30 | epidemicsound.com |
Keyword Overlap Rate: 829%
Acquisition Strategy · Insight
epidemicsound.com acquires users primarily through Direct (45%), while uppbeat.io relies on Search (54%). This reflects fundamentally different go-to-market strategies — epidemicsound.com's higher direct traffic suggests stronger brand recognition or product-led growth, while uppbeat.io's search reliance means growth is more scalable but more vulnerable to algorithm changes.
Business Maturity
| epidemicsound.com | uppbeat.io | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Domain Age | 17y 3m | 6y | epidemicsound.com |
| Registered | May 2009 | Aug 2020 | |
| Expires | May 2026 | Aug 2026 |
Business Maturity · Insight
epidemicsound.com has been in the market for over a decade, indicating established presence.
Market Position
| epidemicsound.com | uppbeat.io | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Global Rank | #6.7K | #31.7K | epidemicsound.com |
| Category Rank | #183 | #165 | uppbeat.io |
| PH Upvotes | — | 18 |
epidemicsound.com only
uppbeat.io only
Market Position · Insight
Each has untapped markets the other serves: epidemicsound.com could expand into Russia, while uppbeat.io could target Brazil.
Key Takeaways
- •epidemicsound.com receives 4.3x more monthly traffic than uppbeat.io (7.2M vs 1.7M).
- •epidemicsound.com acquires users primarily through Direct (45%), while uppbeat.io relies on Search (54%). This reflects fundamentally different go-to-market strategies — epidemicsound.com's higher direct traffic suggests stronger brand recognition or product-led growth, while uppbeat.io's search reliance means growth is more scalable but more vulnerable to algorithm changes.
- •epidemicsound.com receives 4.3x more monthly traffic than uppbeat.io (7.2M vs 1.7M).
- •epidemicsound.com keeps visitors significantly longer (3m56s avg session vs uppbeat.io's 2m33s), suggesting deeper product engagement or stickier content.
- •epidemicsound.com acquires traffic primarily through Direct (45%), while uppbeat.io relies on Search (54%) — fundamentally different acquisition strategies.
- •They share 58 keywords (829% overlap), indicating direct search competition.
You've seen the gap. Now steal the playbook.
A Growth Teardown reverse-engineers exactly how each product grows — traffic sources, backlink strategy, keyword gaps, and scored action items you can copy this week.
Related Comparisons
Report based on data from July 2026