every.to vs simonwillison.net
Market traction comparison · Updated Jul 2026
| every.to | simonwillison.net | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Monthly Visits | 576.9K | 1.3M | simonwillison.net |
| Bounce Rate | 47.9% | 56.3% | every.to |
| Domain Rating | 77 | — | |
| SEO & Keywords | 30 | 30 | Tie |
| Domain Age | 6y 8m | 21y 5m | simonwillison.net |
simonwillison.net leads in 2 of 4 dimensions, while every.to leads in 1.
Growth Momentum
| every.to | simonwillison.net | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Monthly Visits | 576.9K | 1.3M | simonwillison.net |
| MoM Change | -14% | +0% | simonwillison.net |
| Avg. Session | 1m07s | 1m48s | simonwillison.net |
| Pages / Visit | 2.1 | 1.8 | every.to |
Growth Momentum · Insight
simonwillison.net receives 2.3x more monthly traffic than every.to (1.3M vs 576.9K).
Acquisition Strategy
| every.to | simonwillison.net | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary Channel | Direct 54% | Direct 45% | |
| Bounce Rate | 47.9% | 56.3% | every.to |
| SEO & Keywords | 30 | 30 | — |
Keyword Overlap Rate: 9%
Acquisition Strategy · Insight
every.to acquires users primarily through Direct (54%), while simonwillison.net relies on Direct (45%). This reflects fundamentally different go-to-market strategies — every.to's higher direct traffic suggests stronger brand recognition or product-led growth, while simonwillison.net's search reliance means growth is more scalable but more vulnerable to algorithm changes.
Business Maturity
| every.to | simonwillison.net | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Domain Age | 6y 8m | 21y 5m | simonwillison.net |
| Registered | Dec 2019 | Mar 2005 | |
| Expires | Dec 2030 | Mar 2028 |
Business Maturity · Insight
simonwillison.net has been in the market for over a decade, indicating established presence.
Market Position
| every.to | simonwillison.net | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Domain Rating | 77 | — | |
| Global Rank | #100.0K | #54.7K | simonwillison.net |
| Category Rank | #835 | #1.1K | every.to |
| PH Upvotes | 179 | — |
every.to only
simonwillison.net only
Market Position · Insight
Each has untapped markets the other serves: every.to could expand into China, Spain, while simonwillison.net could target Canada, United Kingdom.
Key Takeaways
- •simonwillison.net receives 2.3x more monthly traffic than every.to (1.3M vs 576.9K).
- •every.to acquires users primarily through Direct (54%), while simonwillison.net relies on Direct (45%). This reflects fundamentally different go-to-market strategies — every.to's higher direct traffic suggests stronger brand recognition or product-led growth, while simonwillison.net's search reliance means growth is more scalable but more vulnerable to algorithm changes.
- •simonwillison.net receives 2.3x more monthly traffic than every.to (1.3M vs 576.9K).
- •simonwillison.net keeps visitors significantly longer (1m48s avg session vs every.to's 1m07s), suggesting deeper product engagement or stickier content.
- •every.to has a 8 percentage point lower bounce rate (48% vs 56%), indicating better landing page relevance or more targeted traffic.
- •With only 9% keyword overlap, they target largely different search audiences.
You've seen the gap. Now steal the playbook.
A Growth Teardown reverse-engineers exactly how each product grows — traffic sources, backlink strategy, keyword gaps, and scored action items you can copy this week.
Related Comparisons
Report based on data from July 2026