facefusion.co vs facefusion.io
Market traction comparison · Updated Jul 2026
| facefusion.co | facefusion.io | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Monthly Visits | 487.9K | 240.0K | facefusion.co |
| Bounce Rate | 39.8% | 45.0% | facefusion.co |
| SEO & Keywords | 30 | 40 | facefusion.io |
| Domain Age | 2y 3m | 3y | facefusion.io |
facefusion.co leads in 2 of 4 dimensions, while facefusion.io leads in 2.
Growth Momentum
| facefusion.co | facefusion.io | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Monthly Visits | 487.9K | 240.0K | facefusion.co |
| MoM Change | -2% | +13% | facefusion.io |
| Avg. Session | 3m26s | 1m29s | facefusion.co |
| Pages / Visit | 4.7 | 2.3 | facefusion.co |
Growth Momentum · Insight
facefusion.io is growing faster (+13%) but visitors stay 2.3x shorter (1m29s vs 3m26s). Rapid growth with declining engagement depth often signals lower-quality traffic or shallow product usage.
Acquisition Strategy
| facefusion.co | facefusion.io | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary Channel | Direct 56% | Search 51% | |
| Bounce Rate | 39.8% | 45.0% | facefusion.co |
| SEO & Keywords | 30 | 40 | facefusion.io |
Keyword Overlap Rate: 0%
| Keyword | Volume | facefusion.co | facefusion.io |
|---|---|---|---|
| facefusion | 59.7K | #3 | #8 |
| face fusion | 5.1K | #3 | #10 |
Acquisition Strategy · Insight
facefusion.co acquires users primarily through Direct (56%), while facefusion.io relies on Search (51%). This reflects fundamentally different go-to-market strategies — facefusion.co's higher direct traffic suggests stronger brand recognition or product-led growth, while facefusion.io's search reliance means growth is more scalable but more vulnerable to algorithm changes.
Business Maturity
| facefusion.co | facefusion.io | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Domain Age | 2y 3m | 3y | facefusion.io |
| Registered | Jun 2024 | Aug 2023 | |
| Expires | Jun 2027 | Aug 2027 |
Business Maturity · Insight
facefusion.io has been in the market 1 years longer (3y vs 2y). facefusion.io's longer track record suggests established operations, while facefusion.co's entry timing indicates the market still attracts new players.
Market Position
| facefusion.co | facefusion.io | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Global Rank | #85.7K | #193.7K | facefusion.co |
| Category Rank | #169 | #3.8K | facefusion.co |
| PH Upvotes | — | 1 |
facefusion.co only
facefusion.io only
Market Position · Insight
Each has untapped markets the other serves: facefusion.co could expand into Sweden, India, Hong Kong SAR China, while facefusion.io could target Brazil, Japan, Russia.
Key Takeaways
- •facefusion.co is losing traffic (-2%) despite 487.9K monthly visits. facefusion.io's +13% growth puts it on a trajectory to overtake.
- •facefusion.io is growing faster (+13%) but visitors stay 2.3x shorter (1m29s vs 3m26s). Rapid growth with declining engagement depth often signals lower-quality traffic or shallow product usage.
- •facefusion.co acquires users primarily through Direct (56%), while facefusion.io relies on Search (51%). This reflects fundamentally different go-to-market strategies — facefusion.co's higher direct traffic suggests stronger brand recognition or product-led growth, while facefusion.io's search reliance means growth is more scalable but more vulnerable to algorithm changes.
- •facefusion.co receives 2.0x more monthly traffic than facefusion.io (487.9K vs 240.0K).
- •facefusion.io is growing (+13%) while facefusion.co is declining (-2%).
- •facefusion.co keeps visitors significantly longer (3m26s avg session vs facefusion.io's 1m29s), suggesting deeper product engagement or stickier content.
You've seen the gap. Now steal the playbook.
A Growth Teardown reverse-engineers exactly how each product grows — traffic sources, backlink strategy, keyword gaps, and scored action items you can copy this week.
Related Comparisons
Report based on data from July 2026