fast3d.io vs sloyd.ai
Market traction comparison · Updated Jul 2026
| fast3d.io | sloyd.ai | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Monthly Visits | 150.1K | 362.9K | sloyd.ai |
| Bounce Rate | 45.2% | 36.4% | sloyd.ai |
| SEO & Keywords | 35 | 35 | Tie |
| Domain Age | 1y 3m | 5y 4m | sloyd.ai |
sloyd.ai leads in 3 of 4 dimensions, while fast3d.io leads in 0.
Growth Momentum
| fast3d.io | sloyd.ai | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Monthly Visits | 150.1K | 362.9K | sloyd.ai |
| MoM Change | -19% | -12% | sloyd.ai |
| Avg. Session | 0m43s | 1m43s | sloyd.ai |
| Pages / Visit | 2.5 | 3.5 | sloyd.ai |
Growth Momentum · Insight
sloyd.ai receives 2.4x more monthly traffic than fast3d.io (362.9K vs 150.1K).
Acquisition Strategy
| fast3d.io | sloyd.ai | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary Channel | Search 60% | Search 70% | |
| Bounce Rate | 45.2% | 36.4% | sloyd.ai |
| SEO & Keywords | 35 | 35 | — |
Keyword Overlap Rate: 0%
| Keyword | Volume | fast3d.io | sloyd.ai |
|---|---|---|---|
| image to 3d model | 39.3K | #3 | #5 |
| image to 3d | 31.5K | #4 | #8 |
| ai 3d model generator | 26.8K | #5 | #9 |
| image to 3d model free | 15.4K | #2 | #1 |
| 3d model ai generator | 6.0K | #4 | #5 |
| ai 3d model generator free | 5.6K | #3 | #4 |
| ai 3d | 4.0K | #7 | #9 |
| 3d model generator ai | 2.7K | #5 | #3 |
Acquisition Strategy · Insight
fast3d.io acquires users primarily through Search (60%), while sloyd.ai relies on Search (70%). This reflects fundamentally different go-to-market strategies — fast3d.io's higher direct traffic suggests stronger brand recognition or product-led growth, while sloyd.ai's search reliance means growth is more scalable but more vulnerable to algorithm changes.
Business Maturity
| fast3d.io | sloyd.ai | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Domain Age | 1y 3m | 5y 4m | sloyd.ai |
| Registered | May 2025 | Apr 2021 | |
| Expires | May 2026 | Apr 2027 |
Business Maturity · Insight
sloyd.ai has been in the market 4 years longer (5y vs 1y). sloyd.ai's longer track record suggests established operations, while fast3d.io's entry timing indicates the market still attracts new players.
Market Position
| fast3d.io | sloyd.ai | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Global Rank | #267.1K | #116.0K | sloyd.ai |
| Category Rank | #4.2K | #2.1K | sloyd.ai |
| PH Upvotes | 56 | — |
fast3d.io only
sloyd.ai only
Market Position · Insight
Each has untapped markets the other serves: fast3d.io could expand into Spain, Russia, while sloyd.ai could target United Kingdom, Indonesia.
Key Takeaways
- •sloyd.ai receives 2.4x more monthly traffic than fast3d.io (362.9K vs 150.1K).
- •fast3d.io acquires users primarily through Search (60%), while sloyd.ai relies on Search (70%). This reflects fundamentally different go-to-market strategies — fast3d.io's higher direct traffic suggests stronger brand recognition or product-led growth, while sloyd.ai's search reliance means growth is more scalable but more vulnerable to algorithm changes.
- •sloyd.ai receives 2.4x more monthly traffic than fast3d.io (362.9K vs 150.1K).
- •sloyd.ai keeps visitors significantly longer (1m43s avg session vs fast3d.io's 0m43s), suggesting deeper product engagement or stickier content.
- •sloyd.ai has a 9 percentage point lower bounce rate (36% vs 45%), indicating better landing page relevance or more targeted traffic.
- •With only 0% keyword overlap, they target largely different search audiences.
You've seen the gap. Now steal the playbook.
A Growth Teardown reverse-engineers exactly how each product grows — traffic sources, backlink strategy, keyword gaps, and scored action items you can copy this week.
Related Comparisons
Report based on data from July 2026