firecrawl.dev vs zyte.com
Market traction comparison · Updated Jul 2026
| firecrawl.dev | zyte.com | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Monthly Visits | 1.4M | 248.2K | firecrawl.dev |
| Bounce Rate | 41.7% | 33.6% | zyte.com |
| SEO & Keywords | 30 | 30 | Tie |
| Domain Age | 2y 5m | 27y 6m | zyte.com |
zyte.com leads in 2 of 4 dimensions, while firecrawl.dev leads in 1.
Growth Momentum
| firecrawl.dev | zyte.com | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Monthly Visits | 1.4M | 248.2K | firecrawl.dev |
| MoM Change | -6% | +2% | zyte.com |
| Avg. Session | 2m40s | 6m42s | zyte.com |
| Pages / Visit | 5.3 | 5.5 | zyte.com |
Growth Momentum · Insight
firecrawl.dev is losing traffic (-6%) despite 1.4M monthly visits. zyte.com's +2% growth puts it on a trajectory to overtake.
Acquisition Strategy
| firecrawl.dev | zyte.com | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary Channel | Direct 46% | Direct 58% | |
| Bounce Rate | 41.7% | 33.6% | zyte.com |
| SEO & Keywords | 30 | 30 | — |
Keyword Overlap Rate: 18%
Acquisition Strategy · Insight
firecrawl.dev acquires users primarily through Direct (46%), while zyte.com relies on Direct (58%). This reflects fundamentally different go-to-market strategies — zyte.com's higher direct traffic suggests stronger brand recognition or product-led growth, while firecrawl.dev's search reliance means growth is more scalable but more vulnerable to algorithm changes.
Business Maturity
| firecrawl.dev | zyte.com | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Domain Age | 2y 5m | 27y 6m | zyte.com |
| Registered | Apr 2024 | Feb 1999 | |
| Expires | Apr 2034 | Jan 2027 |
Business Maturity · Insight
zyte.com has been in the market for over a decade, indicating established presence.
Market Position
| firecrawl.dev | zyte.com | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Global Rank | #31.3K | #147.3K | firecrawl.dev |
| Category Rank | #482 | #1.7K | firecrawl.dev |
| PH Upvotes | 596 | — |
firecrawl.dev only
zyte.com only
Market Position · Insight
Each has untapped markets the other serves: firecrawl.dev could expand into Ireland, Egypt, United Kingdom, while zyte.com could target China, Germany, Canada.
Key Takeaways
- •firecrawl.dev is losing traffic (-6%) despite 1.4M monthly visits. zyte.com's +2% growth puts it on a trajectory to overtake.
- •firecrawl.dev acquires users primarily through Direct (46%), while zyte.com relies on Direct (58%). This reflects fundamentally different go-to-market strategies — zyte.com's higher direct traffic suggests stronger brand recognition or product-led growth, while firecrawl.dev's search reliance means growth is more scalable but more vulnerable to algorithm changes.
- •firecrawl.dev receives 5.6x more monthly traffic than zyte.com (1.4M vs 248.2K).
- •zyte.com is growing (+2%) while firecrawl.dev is declining (-6%).
- •zyte.com keeps visitors significantly longer (6m42s avg session vs firecrawl.dev's 2m40s), suggesting deeper product engagement or stickier content.
- •zyte.com has a 8 percentage point lower bounce rate (34% vs 42%), indicating better landing page relevance or more targeted traffic.
You've seen the gap. Now steal the playbook.
A Growth Teardown reverse-engineers exactly how each product grows — traffic sources, backlink strategy, keyword gaps, and scored action items you can copy this week.
Related Comparisons
Report based on data from July 2026