fitbod.me vs sweat.com
Market traction comparison · Updated Jul 2026
| fitbod.me | sweat.com | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Monthly Visits | 725.2K | 399.2K | fitbod.me |
| Bounce Rate | 49.0% | 41.4% | sweat.com |
| SEO & Keywords | 35 | 30 | fitbod.me |
| Domain Age | 11y 1m | 28y 8m | sweat.com |
fitbod.me leads in 2 of 4 dimensions, while sweat.com leads in 2.
Growth Momentum
| fitbod.me | sweat.com | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Monthly Visits | 725.2K | 399.2K | fitbod.me |
| MoM Change | +6% | -8% | fitbod.me |
| Avg. Session | 1m41s | 0m52s | fitbod.me |
| Pages / Visit | 3.4 | 2.0 | fitbod.me |
Growth Momentum · Insight
sweat.com is losing traffic (-8%) despite 399.2K monthly visits. fitbod.me's +6% growth puts it on a trajectory to overtake.
Acquisition Strategy
| fitbod.me | sweat.com | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary Channel | Search 67% | Search 70% | |
| Bounce Rate | 49.0% | 41.4% | sweat.com |
| SEO & Keywords | 35 | 30 | fitbod.me |
Keyword Overlap Rate: 33%
| Keyword | Volume | fitbod.me | sweat.com |
|---|---|---|---|
| dumbbell romanian deadlift | 22.8K | #5 | #6 |
Acquisition Strategy · Insight
fitbod.me acquires users primarily through Search (67%), while sweat.com relies on Search (70%). This reflects fundamentally different go-to-market strategies — fitbod.me's higher direct traffic suggests stronger brand recognition or product-led growth, while sweat.com's search reliance means growth is more scalable but more vulnerable to algorithm changes.
Business Maturity
| fitbod.me | sweat.com | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Domain Age | 11y 1m | 28y 8m | sweat.com |
| Registered | Aug 2015 | Dec 1997 | |
| Expires | Aug 2026 | Dec 2026 |
Business Maturity · Insight
sweat.com has been in the market for over a decade, indicating established presence.
Market Position
| fitbod.me | sweat.com | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Global Rank | #66.2K | #135.6K | fitbod.me |
| Category Rank | #567 | #1.9K | fitbod.me |
fitbod.me only
sweat.com only
Market Position · Insight
Each has untapped markets the other serves: fitbod.me could expand into Australia, Belgium, while sweat.com could target Vietnam, Mexico.
Key Takeaways
- •sweat.com is losing traffic (-8%) despite 399.2K monthly visits. fitbod.me's +6% growth puts it on a trajectory to overtake.
- •fitbod.me acquires users primarily through Search (67%), while sweat.com relies on Search (70%). This reflects fundamentally different go-to-market strategies — fitbod.me's higher direct traffic suggests stronger brand recognition or product-led growth, while sweat.com's search reliance means growth is more scalable but more vulnerable to algorithm changes.
- •fitbod.me has 1.8x more traffic (725.2K vs 399.2K), though both operate at comparable scale.
- •fitbod.me is growing (+6%) while sweat.com is declining (-8%).
- •fitbod.me keeps visitors significantly longer (1m41s avg session vs sweat.com's 0m52s), suggesting deeper product engagement or stickier content.
- •They share 16 keywords (33% overlap), indicating direct search competition.
You've seen the gap. Now steal the playbook.
A Growth Teardown reverse-engineers exactly how each product grows — traffic sources, backlink strategy, keyword gaps, and scored action items you can copy this week.
Related Comparisons
Report based on data from July 2026