fly.dev vs md-to.com
Market traction comparison · Updated Jul 2026
| fly.dev | md-to.com | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Monthly Visits | 1.8M | 129.5K | fly.dev |
| Bounce Rate | 34.7% | 49.2% | fly.dev |
| SEO & Keywords | 35 | 20 | fly.dev |
| Domain Age | 7y 6m | 8m | fly.dev |
fly.dev leads in 4 of 4 dimensions, while md-to.com leads in 0.
Growth Momentum
| fly.dev | md-to.com | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Monthly Visits | 1.8M | 129.5K | fly.dev |
| MoM Change | -12% | +19% | md-to.com |
| Avg. Session | 8m27s | 0m25s | fly.dev |
| Pages / Visit | 7.5 | 1.4 | fly.dev |
Growth Momentum · Insight
md-to.com is growing faster (+19%) but visitors stay 19.9x shorter (0m25s vs 8m27s). Rapid growth with declining engagement depth often signals lower-quality traffic or shallow product usage.
Acquisition Strategy
| fly.dev | md-to.com | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary Channel | Direct 80% | Search 34% | |
| Bounce Rate | 34.7% | 49.2% | fly.dev |
| SEO & Keywords | 35 | 20 | fly.dev |
Keyword Overlap Rate: 12%
Acquisition Strategy · Insight
fly.dev acquires users primarily through Direct (80%), while md-to.com relies on Search (34%). This reflects fundamentally different go-to-market strategies — fly.dev's higher direct traffic suggests stronger brand recognition or product-led growth, while md-to.com's search reliance means growth is more scalable but more vulnerable to algorithm changes.
Business Maturity
| fly.dev | md-to.com | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Domain Age | 7y 6m | 8m | fly.dev |
| Registered | Mar 2019 | Dec 2025 | |
| Expires | Mar 2034 | Dec 2026 |
Business Maturity · Insight
fly.dev has a 7-year head start, but md-to.com's trajectory shows strong growth momentum.
Market Position
| fly.dev | md-to.com | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Global Rank | — | #372.3K | |
| PH Upvotes | 15 | 7 | fly.dev |
fly.dev only
md-to.com only
Market Position · Insight
md-to.com is heavily concentrated in China (53%), creating dependency risk on a single market. fly.dev has a more diversified audience.
Each has untapped markets the other serves: fly.dev could expand into China, Taiwan, Hong Kong SAR China, while md-to.com could target India, Vietnam, Uzbekistan.
Key Takeaways
- •fly.dev is losing traffic (-12%) despite 1.8M monthly visits. md-to.com's +19% growth puts it on a trajectory to overtake.
- •md-to.com is growing faster (+19%) but visitors stay 19.9x shorter (0m25s vs 8m27s). Rapid growth with declining engagement depth often signals lower-quality traffic or shallow product usage.
- •fly.dev acquires users primarily through Direct (80%), while md-to.com relies on Search (34%). This reflects fundamentally different go-to-market strategies — fly.dev's higher direct traffic suggests stronger brand recognition or product-led growth, while md-to.com's search reliance means growth is more scalable but more vulnerable to algorithm changes.
- •fly.dev receives 14.1x more monthly traffic than md-to.com (1.8M vs 129.5K).
- •md-to.com is growing (+19%) while fly.dev is declining (-12%).
- •fly.dev keeps visitors significantly longer (8m27s avg session vs md-to.com's 0m25s), suggesting deeper product engagement or stickier content.
You've seen the gap. Now steal the playbook.
A Growth Teardown reverse-engineers exactly how each product grows — traffic sources, backlink strategy, keyword gaps, and scored action items you can copy this week.
Related Comparisons
Report based on data from July 2026