framer.com vs motion.dev
Market traction comparison · Updated Jul 2026
| framer.com | motion.dev | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Monthly Visits | 5.5M | 544.9K | framer.com |
| Bounce Rate | 33.8% | 44.5% | framer.com |
| SEO & Keywords | 35 | 30 | framer.com |
| Domain Age | 29y 8m | 6y 5m | framer.com |
framer.com leads in 4 of 4 dimensions, while motion.dev leads in 0.
Growth Momentum
| framer.com | motion.dev | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Monthly Visits | 5.5M | 544.9K | framer.com |
| MoM Change | +0% | +14% | motion.dev |
| Avg. Session | 10m18s | 1m45s | framer.com |
| Pages / Visit | 13.0 | 4.5 | framer.com |
Growth Momentum · Insight
motion.dev is growing faster (+14%) but visitors stay 5.9x shorter (1m45s vs 10m18s). Rapid growth with declining engagement depth often signals lower-quality traffic or shallow product usage.
Acquisition Strategy
| framer.com | motion.dev | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary Channel | Direct 56% | Search 52% | |
| Bounce Rate | 33.8% | 44.5% | framer.com |
| SEO & Keywords | 35 | 30 | framer.com |
Keyword Overlap Rate: 150%
Acquisition Strategy · Insight
framer.com acquires users primarily through Direct (56%), while motion.dev relies on Search (52%). This reflects fundamentally different go-to-market strategies — framer.com's higher direct traffic suggests stronger brand recognition or product-led growth, while motion.dev's search reliance means growth is more scalable but more vulnerable to algorithm changes.
Business Maturity
| framer.com | motion.dev | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Domain Age | 29y 8m | 6y 5m | framer.com |
| Registered | Dec 1996 | Apr 2020 | |
| Expires | Dec 2027 | Apr 2028 |
Business Maturity · Insight
framer.com has been in the market for over a decade, indicating established presence.
Market Position
| framer.com | motion.dev | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Global Rank | #5.9K | #75.5K | framer.com |
| Category Rank | #208 | #757 | framer.com |
| PH Upvotes | 438 | — |
framer.com only
motion.dev only
Market Position · Insight
Each has untapped markets the other serves: framer.com could expand into Indonesia, Brazil, while motion.dev could target United Kingdom, Canada.
Key Takeaways
- •framer.com receives 10.1x more monthly traffic than motion.dev (5.5M vs 544.9K).
- •motion.dev is growing faster (+14%) but visitors stay 5.9x shorter (1m45s vs 10m18s). Rapid growth with declining engagement depth often signals lower-quality traffic or shallow product usage.
- •framer.com acquires users primarily through Direct (56%), while motion.dev relies on Search (52%). This reflects fundamentally different go-to-market strategies — framer.com's higher direct traffic suggests stronger brand recognition or product-led growth, while motion.dev's search reliance means growth is more scalable but more vulnerable to algorithm changes.
- •framer.com receives 10.1x more monthly traffic than motion.dev (5.5M vs 544.9K).
- •framer.com keeps visitors significantly longer (10m18s avg session vs motion.dev's 1m45s), suggesting deeper product engagement or stickier content.
- •framer.com has a 11 percentage point lower bounce rate (34% vs 44%), indicating better landing page relevance or more targeted traffic.
You've seen the gap. Now steal the playbook.
A Growth Teardown reverse-engineers exactly how each product grows — traffic sources, backlink strategy, keyword gaps, and scored action items you can copy this week.
Related Comparisons
Report based on data from July 2026