galileo.ai vs onyx.app
Market traction comparison · Updated Jul 2026
| galileo.ai | onyx.app | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Monthly Visits | 188.2K | 370.8K | onyx.app |
| Bounce Rate | 40.9% | 47.3% | galileo.ai |
| SEO & Keywords | 30 | 30 | Tie |
| Domain Age | 6y 4m | 8y 4m | onyx.app |
onyx.app leads in 2 of 4 dimensions, while galileo.ai leads in 1.
Growth Momentum
| galileo.ai | onyx.app | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Monthly Visits | 188.2K | 370.8K | onyx.app |
| MoM Change | +1% | -13% | galileo.ai |
| Avg. Session | 0m49s | 0m42s | galileo.ai |
| Pages / Visit | 2.5 | 2.1 | galileo.ai |
Growth Momentum · Insight
onyx.app is losing traffic (-13%) despite 370.8K monthly visits. galileo.ai's +1% growth puts it on a trajectory to overtake.
Acquisition Strategy
| galileo.ai | onyx.app | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary Channel | Search 74% | Search 61% | |
| Bounce Rate | 40.9% | 47.3% | galileo.ai |
| SEO & Keywords | 30 | 30 | — |
Keyword Overlap Rate: 5%
Acquisition Strategy · Insight
galileo.ai acquires users primarily through Search (74%), while onyx.app relies on Search (61%). This reflects fundamentally different go-to-market strategies — onyx.app's higher direct traffic suggests stronger brand recognition or product-led growth, while galileo.ai's search reliance means growth is more scalable but more vulnerable to algorithm changes.
Business Maturity
| galileo.ai | onyx.app | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Domain Age | 6y 4m | 8y 4m | onyx.app |
| Registered | May 2020 | May 2018 | |
| Expires | May 2028 | May 2026 |
Business Maturity · Insight
onyx.app has been in the market 2 years longer (8y vs 6y). onyx.app's longer track record suggests established operations, while galileo.ai's entry timing indicates the market still attracts new players.
Market Position
| galileo.ai | onyx.app | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Global Rank | #223.6K | #139.8K | onyx.app |
| Category Rank | #2.1K | #2.6K | galileo.ai |
| PH Upvotes | — | 159 |
galileo.ai only
onyx.app only
Market Position · Insight
Each has untapped markets the other serves: galileo.ai could expand into Germany, Brazil, Spain, while onyx.app could target Vietnam, South Korea, Indonesia.
Key Takeaways
- •onyx.app is losing traffic (-13%) despite 370.8K monthly visits. galileo.ai's +1% growth puts it on a trajectory to overtake.
- •galileo.ai acquires users primarily through Search (74%), while onyx.app relies on Search (61%). This reflects fundamentally different go-to-market strategies — onyx.app's higher direct traffic suggests stronger brand recognition or product-led growth, while galileo.ai's search reliance means growth is more scalable but more vulnerable to algorithm changes.
- •onyx.app has 2.0x more traffic (370.8K vs 188.2K), though both operate at comparable scale.
- •galileo.ai is growing (+1%) while onyx.app is declining (-13%).
- •With only 5% keyword overlap, they target largely different search audiences.
You've seen the gap. Now steal the playbook.
A Growth Teardown reverse-engineers exactly how each product grows — traffic sources, backlink strategy, keyword gaps, and scored action items you can copy this week.
Related Comparisons
Report based on data from July 2026