gamma.design vs skywork.ai
Market traction comparison · Updated Jul 2026
| gamma.design | skywork.ai | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Monthly Visits | 352.3K | 2.6M | skywork.ai |
| Bounce Rate | 40.1% | 43.5% | gamma.design |
| SEO & Keywords | 30 | 35 | skywork.ai |
| Domain Age | 1y 5m | 3y 9m | skywork.ai |
skywork.ai leads in 3 of 4 dimensions, while gamma.design leads in 1.
Growth Momentum
| gamma.design | skywork.ai | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Monthly Visits | 352.3K | 2.6M | skywork.ai |
| MoM Change | -20% | -15% | skywork.ai |
| Avg. Session | 1m01s | 3m09s | skywork.ai |
| Pages / Visit | 2.8 | 3.1 | skywork.ai |
Growth Momentum · Insight
skywork.ai receives 7.3x more monthly traffic than gamma.design (2.6M vs 352.3K).
Acquisition Strategy
| gamma.design | skywork.ai | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary Channel | Search 82% | Search 69% | |
| Bounce Rate | 40.1% | 43.5% | gamma.design |
| SEO & Keywords | 30 | 35 | skywork.ai |
Keyword Overlap Rate: 282%
Acquisition Strategy · Insight
gamma.design acquires users primarily through Search (82%), while skywork.ai relies on Search (69%). This reflects fundamentally different go-to-market strategies — skywork.ai's higher direct traffic suggests stronger brand recognition or product-led growth, while gamma.design's search reliance means growth is more scalable but more vulnerable to algorithm changes.
Business Maturity
| gamma.design | skywork.ai | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Domain Age | 1y 5m | 3y 9m | skywork.ai |
| Registered | Mar 2025 | Nov 2022 | |
| Expires | Mar 2028 | Nov 2026 |
Business Maturity · Insight
skywork.ai has been in the market 2 years longer (4y vs 1y). skywork.ai's longer track record suggests established operations, while gamma.design's entry timing indicates the market still attracts new players.
Market Position
| gamma.design | skywork.ai | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Global Rank | #130.5K | #22.5K | skywork.ai |
| Category Rank | #431 | #229 | skywork.ai |
| PH Upvotes | — | 93 |
gamma.design only
skywork.ai only
Market Position · Insight
Each has untapped markets the other serves: gamma.design could expand into Mexico, South Korea, Peru, while skywork.ai could target Georgia, India, Vietnam.
Key Takeaways
- •skywork.ai receives 7.3x more monthly traffic than gamma.design (2.6M vs 352.3K).
- •gamma.design acquires users primarily through Search (82%), while skywork.ai relies on Search (69%). This reflects fundamentally different go-to-market strategies — skywork.ai's higher direct traffic suggests stronger brand recognition or product-led growth, while gamma.design's search reliance means growth is more scalable but more vulnerable to algorithm changes.
- •skywork.ai receives 7.3x more monthly traffic than gamma.design (2.6M vs 352.3K).
- •skywork.ai keeps visitors significantly longer (3m09s avg session vs gamma.design's 1m01s), suggesting deeper product engagement or stickier content.
- •They share 48 keywords (282% overlap), indicating direct search competition.
You've seen the gap. Now steal the playbook.
A Growth Teardown reverse-engineers exactly how each product grows — traffic sources, backlink strategy, keyword gaps, and scored action items you can copy this week.
Related Comparisons
Report based on data from July 2026