geology.com vs worldatlas.com
Market traction comparison · Updated Jul 2026
| geology.com | worldatlas.com | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Monthly Visits | 1.4M | 8.5M | worldatlas.com |
| Bounce Rate | 55.4% | 64.3% | geology.com |
| SEO & Keywords | 30 | 30 | Tie |
| Domain Age | 30y 7m | 30y 3m | geology.com |
geology.com leads in 2 of 4 dimensions, while worldatlas.com leads in 1.
Growth Momentum
| geology.com | worldatlas.com | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Monthly Visits | 1.4M | 8.5M | worldatlas.com |
| MoM Change | -6% | +7% | worldatlas.com |
| Avg. Session | 0m54s | 0m51s | geology.com |
| Pages / Visit | 2.0 | 1.5 | geology.com |
Growth Momentum · Insight
geology.com is losing traffic (-6%) despite 1.4M monthly visits. worldatlas.com's +7% growth puts it on a trajectory to overtake.
Acquisition Strategy
| geology.com | worldatlas.com | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary Channel | Search 81% | Search 52% | |
| Bounce Rate | 55.4% | 64.3% | geology.com |
| SEO & Keywords | 30 | 30 | — |
Keyword Overlap Rate: 0%
| Keyword | Volume | geology.com | worldatlas.com |
|---|---|---|---|
| africa map | 199.1K | #1 | #4 |
| asian map | 5.5K | #1 | #2 |
Acquisition Strategy · Insight
geology.com acquires users primarily through Search (81%), while worldatlas.com relies on Search (52%). This reflects fundamentally different go-to-market strategies — worldatlas.com's higher direct traffic suggests stronger brand recognition or product-led growth, while geology.com's search reliance means growth is more scalable but more vulnerable to algorithm changes.
Business Maturity
| geology.com | worldatlas.com | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Domain Age | 30y 7m | 30y 3m | geology.com |
| Registered | Jan 1996 | May 1996 | |
| Expires | Jan 2031 | Jul 2026 |
Business Maturity · Insight
geology.com has been in the market for over a decade, indicating established presence.
Market Position
| geology.com | worldatlas.com | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Global Rank | #46.1K | #9.8K | worldatlas.com |
| Category Rank | #6 | #7 | geology.com |
Key Takeaways
- •geology.com is losing traffic (-6%) despite 1.4M monthly visits. worldatlas.com's +7% growth puts it on a trajectory to overtake.
- •geology.com acquires users primarily through Search (81%), while worldatlas.com relies on Search (52%). This reflects fundamentally different go-to-market strategies — worldatlas.com's higher direct traffic suggests stronger brand recognition or product-led growth, while geology.com's search reliance means growth is more scalable but more vulnerable to algorithm changes.
- •worldatlas.com receives 6.0x more monthly traffic than geology.com (8.5M vs 1.4M).
- •worldatlas.com is growing (+7%) while geology.com is declining (-6%).
- •geology.com has a 9 percentage point lower bounce rate (55% vs 64%), indicating better landing page relevance or more targeted traffic.
- •With only 0% keyword overlap, they target largely different search audiences.
You've seen the gap. Now steal the playbook.
A Growth Teardown reverse-engineers exactly how each product grows — traffic sources, backlink strategy, keyword gaps, and scored action items you can copy this week.
Related Comparisons
Report based on data from July 2026