gong.io vs outplayhq.com
Market traction comparison · Updated Jul 2026
| gong.io | outplayhq.com | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Monthly Visits | 2.4M | 15.1K | gong.io |
| Bounce Rate | 34.1% | 25.1% | outplayhq.com |
| SEO & Keywords | 35 | 35 | Tie |
| Domain Age | 13y | 8y 5m | gong.io |
gong.io leads in 2 of 4 dimensions, while outplayhq.com leads in 1.
Growth Momentum
| gong.io | outplayhq.com | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Monthly Visits | 2.4M | 15.1K | gong.io |
| MoM Change | +8% | -18% | gong.io |
| Avg. Session | 5m54s | 4m58s | gong.io |
| Pages / Visit | 6.0 | 7.3 | outplayhq.com |
Growth Momentum · Insight
outplayhq.com is losing traffic (-18%) despite 15.1K monthly visits. gong.io's +8% growth puts it on a trajectory to overtake.
Acquisition Strategy
| gong.io | outplayhq.com | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary Channel | Direct 64% | Direct 84% | |
| Bounce Rate | 34.1% | 25.1% | outplayhq.com |
| SEO & Keywords | 35 | 35 | — |
Keyword Overlap Rate: 19%
Acquisition Strategy · Insight
gong.io acquires users primarily through Direct (64%), while outplayhq.com relies on Direct (84%). This reflects fundamentally different go-to-market strategies — outplayhq.com's higher direct traffic suggests stronger brand recognition or product-led growth, while gong.io's search reliance means growth is more scalable but more vulnerable to algorithm changes.
Business Maturity
| gong.io | outplayhq.com | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Domain Age | 13y | 8y 5m | gong.io |
| Registered | Aug 2013 | Apr 2018 | |
| Expires | Aug 2026 | Apr 2026 |
Business Maturity · Insight
gong.io has been in the market for over a decade, indicating established presence.
Market Position
| gong.io | outplayhq.com | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Global Rank | #20.5K | #1.1M | gong.io |
| Category Rank | #90 | #2.4K | gong.io |
gong.io only
outplayhq.com only
Market Position · Insight
Each has untapped markets the other serves: gong.io could expand into Vietnam, Brazil, while outplayhq.com could target Australia, Canada.
Key Takeaways
- •outplayhq.com is losing traffic (-18%) despite 15.1K monthly visits. gong.io's +8% growth puts it on a trajectory to overtake.
- •gong.io acquires users primarily through Direct (64%), while outplayhq.com relies on Direct (84%). This reflects fundamentally different go-to-market strategies — outplayhq.com's higher direct traffic suggests stronger brand recognition or product-led growth, while gong.io's search reliance means growth is more scalable but more vulnerable to algorithm changes.
- •gong.io receives 157.7x more monthly traffic than outplayhq.com (2.4M vs 15.1K).
- •gong.io is growing (+8%) while outplayhq.com is declining (-18%).
- •outplayhq.com has a 9 percentage point lower bounce rate (25% vs 34%), indicating better landing page relevance or more targeted traffic.
- •They share 11 keywords (19% overlap), indicating direct search competition.
You've seen the gap. Now steal the playbook.
A Growth Teardown reverse-engineers exactly how each product grows — traffic sources, backlink strategy, keyword gaps, and scored action items you can copy this week.
Related Comparisons
Report based on data from July 2026