goo.gl vs maps.me
Market traction comparison · Updated Jul 2026
| goo.gl | maps.me | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Monthly Visits | 73.7M | 567.4K | goo.gl |
| Bounce Rate | 77.3% | 44.3% | maps.me |
| SEO & Keywords | 5 | 30 | maps.me |
| Domain Age | 21y 2m | 18y 4m | goo.gl |
goo.gl leads in 2 of 4 dimensions, while maps.me leads in 2.
Growth Momentum
| goo.gl | maps.me | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Monthly Visits | 73.7M | 567.4K | goo.gl |
| MoM Change | +10% | +2% | goo.gl |
| Avg. Session | 0m51s | 0m26s | goo.gl |
| Pages / Visit | 1.4 | 1.8 | maps.me |
Growth Momentum · Insight
goo.gl is growing +10% while maps.me grows +2%. At current trajectory, goo.gl could close the traffic gap within 10 months.
Acquisition Strategy
| goo.gl | maps.me | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary Channel | Search 47% | Search 49% | |
| Bounce Rate | 77.3% | 44.3% | maps.me |
| SEO & Keywords | 5 | 30 | maps.me |
Keyword Overlap Rate: 30%
Acquisition Strategy · Insight
goo.gl acquires users primarily through Search (47%), while maps.me relies on Search (49%). This reflects fundamentally different go-to-market strategies — maps.me's higher direct traffic suggests stronger brand recognition or product-led growth, while maps.me's search reliance means growth is more scalable but more vulnerable to algorithm changes.
Business Maturity
| goo.gl | maps.me | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Domain Age | 21y 2m | 18y 4m | goo.gl |
| Registered | Jun 2005 | Apr 2008 | |
| Expires | Jan 2027 | Apr 2030 |
Business Maturity · Insight
goo.gl has been in the market for over a decade, indicating established presence.
Market Position
| goo.gl | maps.me | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Global Rank | #988 | #104.0K | goo.gl |
| Category Rank | #39 | #4.7K | goo.gl |
| PH Upvotes | 9 | — |
goo.gl only
maps.me only
Market Position · Insight
Each has untapped markets the other serves: goo.gl could expand into Russia, France, Uzbekistan, while maps.me could target Japan, India, Canada.
Key Takeaways
- •goo.gl is growing +10% while maps.me grows +2%. At current trajectory, goo.gl could close the traffic gap within 10 months.
- •goo.gl acquires users primarily through Search (47%), while maps.me relies on Search (49%). This reflects fundamentally different go-to-market strategies — maps.me's higher direct traffic suggests stronger brand recognition or product-led growth, while maps.me's search reliance means growth is more scalable but more vulnerable to algorithm changes.
- •goo.gl receives 129.9x more monthly traffic than maps.me (73.7M vs 567.4K).
- •Both are growing, with goo.gl accelerating faster at +10% vs +2%.
- •goo.gl keeps visitors significantly longer (0m51s avg session vs maps.me's 0m26s), suggesting deeper product engagement or stickier content.
- •maps.me has a 33 percentage point lower bounce rate (44% vs 77%), indicating better landing page relevance or more targeted traffic.
You've seen the gap. Now steal the playbook.
A Growth Teardown reverse-engineers exactly how each product grows — traffic sources, backlink strategy, keyword gaps, and scored action items you can copy this week.
Related Comparisons
Report based on data from July 2026