grammarly.com vs quillbot.com
Market traction comparison · Updated Jul 2026
| grammarly.com | quillbot.com | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Monthly Visits | 44.5M | 31.4M | grammarly.com |
| Bounce Rate | 40.3% | 46.4% | grammarly.com |
| SEO & Keywords | 35 | 30 | grammarly.com |
| Domain Age | 17y 2m | 8y 8m | grammarly.com |
grammarly.com leads in 4 of 4 dimensions, while quillbot.com leads in 0.
Growth Momentum
| grammarly.com | quillbot.com | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Monthly Visits | 44.5M | 31.4M | grammarly.com |
| MoM Change | -3% | -8% | grammarly.com |
| Avg. Session | 4m41s | 2m53s | grammarly.com |
| Pages / Visit | 7.8 | 5.4 | grammarly.com |
Growth Momentum · Insight
grammarly.com receives 1.4x more monthly traffic than quillbot.com (44.5M vs 31.4M).
Acquisition Strategy
| grammarly.com | quillbot.com | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary Channel | Direct 50% | Search 53% | |
| Bounce Rate | 40.3% | 46.4% | grammarly.com |
| SEO & Keywords | 35 | 30 | grammarly.com |
Keyword Overlap Rate: 0%
| Keyword | Volume | grammarly.com | quillbot.com |
|---|---|---|---|
| ai detector | 7.9M | #4 | #3 |
| ai checker | 4.5M | #4 | #5 |
| word counter | 2.9M | #3 | #5 |
| humanize ai | 1.9M | #6 | #3 |
| ai humanizer | 1.3M | #6 | #2 |
| detector de ia | 787.4K | #4 | #2 |
| humanizer | 719.5K | #3 | #2 |
| plagiarism checker | 699.8K | #1 | #6 |
| character counter | 658.0K | #3 | #6 |
| apa citation generator | 515.0K | #7 | #6 |
Acquisition Strategy · Insight
grammarly.com acquires users primarily through Direct (50%), while quillbot.com relies on Search (53%). This reflects fundamentally different go-to-market strategies — grammarly.com's higher direct traffic suggests stronger brand recognition or product-led growth, while quillbot.com's search reliance means growth is more scalable but more vulnerable to algorithm changes.
Business Maturity
| grammarly.com | quillbot.com | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Domain Age | 17y 2m | 8y 8m | grammarly.com |
| Registered | Jul 2009 | Dec 2017 | |
| Expires | Jul 2026 | Dec 2029 |
Business Maturity · Insight
grammarly.com has been in the market for over a decade, indicating established presence.
Market Position
| grammarly.com | quillbot.com | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Global Rank | #688 | #1.3K | grammarly.com |
| Category Rank | #2 | #1 | quillbot.com |
| PH Upvotes | 5 | — |
grammarly.com only
quillbot.com only
Market Position · Insight
grammarly.com is heavily concentrated in United States (47%), creating dependency risk on a single market. quillbot.com has a more diversified audience.
Each has untapped markets the other serves: grammarly.com could expand into Malaysia, Brazil, while quillbot.com could target United Kingdom, Canada.
Key Takeaways
- •grammarly.com receives 1.4x more monthly traffic than quillbot.com (44.5M vs 31.4M).
- •grammarly.com acquires users primarily through Direct (50%), while quillbot.com relies on Search (53%). This reflects fundamentally different go-to-market strategies — grammarly.com's higher direct traffic suggests stronger brand recognition or product-led growth, while quillbot.com's search reliance means growth is more scalable but more vulnerable to algorithm changes.
- •grammarly.com has 1.4x more traffic (44.5M vs 31.4M), though both operate at comparable scale.
- •grammarly.com keeps visitors significantly longer (4m41s avg session vs quillbot.com's 2m53s), suggesting deeper product engagement or stickier content.
- •grammarly.com acquires traffic primarily through Direct (50%), while quillbot.com relies on Search (53%) — fundamentally different acquisition strategies.
- •With only 0% keyword overlap, they target largely different search audiences.
You've seen the gap. Now steal the playbook.
A Growth Teardown reverse-engineers exactly how each product grows — traffic sources, backlink strategy, keyword gaps, and scored action items you can copy this week.
Related Comparisons
Report based on data from July 2026