greatplacetowork.com vs utk.edu

Market traction comparison · Updated Jul 2026

greatplacetowork.com favicongreatplacetowork.com
VS
utk.edu faviconutk.edu
 greatplacetowork.comutk.eduLeads
Monthly Visits264.0K1.5Mutk.edu
Bounce Rate52.7%49.6%utk.edu
SEO & Keywords3030Tie
Domain Age30y 1m

utk.edu leads in 2 of 3 dimensions, while greatplacetowork.com leads in 0.

Growth Momentum

Growth Momentum
greatplacetowork.comutk.edu
 greatplacetowork.comutk.eduLeads
Monthly Visits264.0K1.5Mutk.edu
MoM Change-68%+2%utk.edu
Avg. Session1m23s2m54sutk.edu
Pages / Visit2.33.3utk.edu

Growth Momentum · Insight

greatplacetowork.com is losing traffic (-68%) despite 264.0K monthly visits. utk.edu's +2% growth puts it on a trajectory to overtake.

Acquisition Strategy

 greatplacetowork.comutk.eduLeads
Primary ChannelDirect 64%Search 39%
Bounce Rate52.7%49.6%utk.edu
SEO & Keywords3030
greatplacetowork.com
Search 27%Direct 64%Social 2%Referral 6%
utk.edu
Search 39%Direct 25%Social 2%Referral 30%Email 3%
SearchDirectSocialReferralPaidEmail
20
10
20
greatplacetowork.com OnlySharedutk.edu Only

Keyword Overlap Rate: 20%

Acquisition Strategy · Insight

greatplacetowork.com acquires users primarily through Direct (64%), while utk.edu relies on Search (39%). This reflects fundamentally different go-to-market strategies — greatplacetowork.com's higher direct traffic suggests stronger brand recognition or product-led growth, while utk.edu's search reliance means growth is more scalable but more vulnerable to algorithm changes.

Business Maturity

 greatplacetowork.comutk.eduLeads
Domain Age30y 1m
RegisteredAug 1996
ExpiresAug 2026

Market Position

 greatplacetowork.comutk.eduLeads
Global Rank#175.7K#37.1Kutk.edu
Category Rank#152#244greatplacetowork.com
greatplacetowork.comutk.edu
🇺🇸 United States
50%
85%

greatplacetowork.com only

🇷🇺 Russia 6%🇧🇷 Brazil 4%🌐 China 3%

utk.edu only

🇩🇪 Germany 1%🇮🇳 India 1%🇨🇦 Canada 1%

Market Position · Insight

Each has untapped markets the other serves: greatplacetowork.com could expand into Germany, India, Canada, while utk.edu could target Russia, Brazil, China.

Key Takeaways

  • greatplacetowork.com is losing traffic (-68%) despite 264.0K monthly visits. utk.edu's +2% growth puts it on a trajectory to overtake.
  • greatplacetowork.com acquires users primarily through Direct (64%), while utk.edu relies on Search (39%). This reflects fundamentally different go-to-market strategies — greatplacetowork.com's higher direct traffic suggests stronger brand recognition or product-led growth, while utk.edu's search reliance means growth is more scalable but more vulnerable to algorithm changes.
  • utk.edu receives 5.7x more monthly traffic than greatplacetowork.com (1.5M vs 264.0K).
  • utk.edu is growing (+2%) while greatplacetowork.com is declining (-68%).
  • utk.edu keeps visitors significantly longer (2m54s avg session vs greatplacetowork.com's 1m23s), suggesting deeper product engagement or stickier content.
  • greatplacetowork.com acquires traffic primarily through Direct (64%), while utk.edu relies on Search (39%) — fundamentally different acquisition strategies.

You've seen the gap. Now steal the playbook.

A Growth Teardown reverse-engineers exactly how each product grows — traffic sources, backlink strategy, keyword gaps, and scored action items you can copy this week.

Related Comparisons

Report based on data from July 2026