gsmarena.com vs samsung.com
Market traction comparison · Updated Jul 2026
| gsmarena.com | samsung.com | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Monthly Visits | 52.0M | 864.9M | samsung.com |
| Bounce Rate | 42.0% | 38.9% | samsung.com |
| SEO & Keywords | 30 | 30 | Tie |
| Domain Age | 26y 2m | 31y 9m | samsung.com |
samsung.com leads in 3 of 4 dimensions, while gsmarena.com leads in 0.
Growth Momentum
| gsmarena.com | samsung.com | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Monthly Visits | 52.0M | 864.9M | samsung.com |
| MoM Change | +10% | +19% | samsung.com |
| Avg. Session | 2m50s | 1m44s | gsmarena.com |
| Pages / Visit | 3.8 | 2.6 | gsmarena.com |
Growth Momentum · Insight
samsung.com is growing faster (+19%) but visitors stay 1.6x shorter (1m44s vs 2m50s). Rapid growth with declining engagement depth often signals lower-quality traffic or shallow product usage.
Acquisition Strategy
| gsmarena.com | samsung.com | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary Channel | Search 62% | Search 49% | |
| Bounce Rate | 42.0% | 38.9% | samsung.com |
| SEO & Keywords | 30 | 30 | — |
Keyword Overlap Rate: 20%
Acquisition Strategy · Insight
gsmarena.com acquires users primarily through Search (62%), while samsung.com relies on Search (49%). This reflects fundamentally different go-to-market strategies — samsung.com's higher direct traffic suggests stronger brand recognition or product-led growth, while gsmarena.com's search reliance means growth is more scalable but more vulnerable to algorithm changes.
Business Maturity
| gsmarena.com | samsung.com | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Domain Age | 26y 2m | 31y 9m | samsung.com |
| Registered | Jun 2000 | Nov 1994 | |
| Expires | Jun 2028 | Nov 2026 |
Business Maturity · Insight
samsung.com has been in the market for over a decade, indicating established presence.
Market Position
| gsmarena.com | samsung.com | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Global Rank | #904 | #52 | samsung.com |
| Category Rank | #10 | #1 | samsung.com |
| PH Upvotes | — | 6 |
gsmarena.com only
samsung.com only
Market Position · Insight
Each has untapped markets the other serves: gsmarena.com could expand into South Korea, Brazil, Germany, while samsung.com could target Indonesia, Pakistan, Bangladesh.
Key Takeaways
- •samsung.com is growing +19% while gsmarena.com grows +10%. At current trajectory, samsung.com could close the traffic gap within 5 months.
- •samsung.com is growing faster (+19%) but visitors stay 1.6x shorter (1m44s vs 2m50s). Rapid growth with declining engagement depth often signals lower-quality traffic or shallow product usage.
- •gsmarena.com acquires users primarily through Search (62%), while samsung.com relies on Search (49%). This reflects fundamentally different go-to-market strategies — samsung.com's higher direct traffic suggests stronger brand recognition or product-led growth, while gsmarena.com's search reliance means growth is more scalable but more vulnerable to algorithm changes.
- •samsung.com receives 16.6x more monthly traffic than gsmarena.com (864.9M vs 52.0M).
- •Both are growing, with samsung.com accelerating faster at +19% vs +10%.
- •gsmarena.com keeps visitors significantly longer (2m50s avg session vs samsung.com's 1m44s), suggesting deeper product engagement or stickier content.
You've seen the gap. Now steal the playbook.
A Growth Teardown reverse-engineers exactly how each product grows — traffic sources, backlink strategy, keyword gaps, and scored action items you can copy this week.
Related Comparisons
Report based on data from July 2026