hackaday.com vs hackaday.io
Market traction comparison · Updated Jul 2026
| hackaday.com | hackaday.io | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Monthly Visits | 2.3M | 621.0K | hackaday.com |
| Bounce Rate | 55.7% | 48.5% | hackaday.io |
| SEO & Keywords | 30 | 30 | Tie |
| Domain Age | 22y 2m | 12y 6m | hackaday.com |
hackaday.com leads in 2 of 4 dimensions, while hackaday.io leads in 1.
Growth Momentum
| hackaday.com | hackaday.io | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Monthly Visits | 2.3M | 621.0K | hackaday.com |
| MoM Change | +5% | +4% | hackaday.com |
| Avg. Session | 1m17s | 1m13s | hackaday.com |
| Pages / Visit | 1.8 | 3.6 | hackaday.io |
Growth Momentum · Insight
hackaday.com receives 3.8x more monthly traffic than hackaday.io (2.3M vs 621.0K).
Acquisition Strategy
| hackaday.com | hackaday.io | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary Channel | Direct 57% | Search 40% | |
| Bounce Rate | 55.7% | 48.5% | hackaday.io |
| SEO & Keywords | 30 | 30 | — |
Keyword Overlap Rate: 200%
Acquisition Strategy · Insight
hackaday.com acquires users primarily through Direct (57%), while hackaday.io relies on Search (40%). This reflects fundamentally different go-to-market strategies — hackaday.com's higher direct traffic suggests stronger brand recognition or product-led growth, while hackaday.io's search reliance means growth is more scalable but more vulnerable to algorithm changes.
Business Maturity
| hackaday.com | hackaday.io | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Domain Age | 22y 2m | 12y 6m | hackaday.com |
| Registered | Jun 2004 | Feb 2014 | |
| Expires | Jun 2029 | Feb 2029 |
Business Maturity · Insight
hackaday.com has been in the market for over a decade, indicating established presence.
Market Position
| hackaday.com | hackaday.io | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Global Rank | #31.2K | #72.9K | hackaday.com |
| Category Rank | #260 | #1.4K | hackaday.com |
hackaday.com only
hackaday.io only
Market Position · Insight
hackaday.com is heavily concentrated in United States (46%), creating dependency risk on a single market. hackaday.io has a more diversified audience.
Each has untapped markets the other serves: hackaday.com could expand into China, India, while hackaday.io could target Canada, Italy.
Key Takeaways
- •hackaday.com receives 3.8x more monthly traffic than hackaday.io (2.3M vs 621.0K).
- •hackaday.com acquires users primarily through Direct (57%), while hackaday.io relies on Search (40%). This reflects fundamentally different go-to-market strategies — hackaday.com's higher direct traffic suggests stronger brand recognition or product-led growth, while hackaday.io's search reliance means growth is more scalable but more vulnerable to algorithm changes.
- •hackaday.com receives 3.8x more monthly traffic than hackaday.io (2.3M vs 621.0K).
- •hackaday.com acquires traffic primarily through Direct (57%), while hackaday.io relies on Search (40%) — fundamentally different acquisition strategies.
- •They share 40 keywords (200% overlap), indicating direct search competition.
- •hackaday.com depends on a single country for 46% of traffic, while hackaday.io is spread across more markets — lower geographic risk.
You've seen the gap. Now steal the playbook.
A Growth Teardown reverse-engineers exactly how each product grows — traffic sources, backlink strategy, keyword gaps, and scored action items you can copy this week.
Related Comparisons
Report based on data from July 2026